Skip to main content
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 150.8k
  • 36
  • 358
  • 958

There were at least two earlier MO questions about ideal pocket billiards. (Ideal: frictionless, perfectly elastic collisions.)

My question is a variation on whether there is always a shot. George Lowther's example involved touching or nearly touching balls, and collinear balls, and forces the cue ball into a pocket--a "scratch." Here I ask for more generic situations:

Q. With the initial ball centers in general position (no three collinear), is there an $\epsilon > 0$ such that, if initially every pair of balls is separated by at least $\epsilon$, there always exists a shot that sinks at least one ball and avoids a scratch?

My guess is Yes, perhaps with $\epsilon = \frac{1}{2}$ (and unit-radius balls). And maybe there is always a shot that sinks all $15$ balls!?

$\mathfrak{Merry}$ $\mathfrak{Christmas!}$

     Grinch_detail

      Chuck Jones Gallery.

There were at least two earlier MO questions about ideal pocket billiards. (Ideal: frictionless, perfectly elastic collisions.)

My question is a variation on whether there is always a shot. George Lowther's example involved touching or nearly touching balls, and collinear balls, and forces the cue ball into a pocket--a "scratch." Here I ask for more generic situations:

Q. With the initial ball centers in general position (no three collinear), is there an $\epsilon > 0$ such that, if initially every pair of balls is separated by at least $\epsilon$, there always exists a shot that sinks at least one ball and avoids a scratch?

My guess is Yes, perhaps with $\epsilon = \frac{1}{2}$ (and unit-radius balls). And maybe there is always a shot that sinks all $15$ balls!?

$\mathfrak{Merry}$ $\mathfrak{Christmas!}$

     Grinch_detail

      Chuck Jones Gallery.

There were at least two earlier MO questions about ideal pocket billiards. (Ideal: frictionless, perfectly elastic collisions.)

My question is a variation on whether there is always a shot. George Lowther's example involved touching or nearly touching balls, and collinear balls, and forces the cue ball into a pocket--a "scratch." Here I ask for more generic situations:

Q. With the initial ball centers in general position (no three collinear), is there an $\epsilon > 0$ such that, if initially every pair of balls is separated by at least $\epsilon$, there always exists a shot that sinks at least one ball and avoids a scratch?

My guess is Yes, perhaps with $\epsilon = \frac{1}{2}$ (and unit-radius balls). And maybe there is always a shot that sinks all $15$ balls?

$\mathfrak{Merry}$ $\mathfrak{Christmas!}$

     Grinch_detail

      Chuck Jones Gallery.

Source Link
Joseph O'Rourke
  • 150.8k
  • 36
  • 358
  • 958

Pocket billiards with balls in general position

There were at least two earlier MO questions about ideal pocket billiards. (Ideal: frictionless, perfectly elastic collisions.)

My question is a variation on whether there is always a shot. George Lowther's example involved touching or nearly touching balls, and collinear balls, and forces the cue ball into a pocket--a "scratch." Here I ask for more generic situations:

Q. With the initial ball centers in general position (no three collinear), is there an $\epsilon > 0$ such that, if initially every pair of balls is separated by at least $\epsilon$, there always exists a shot that sinks at least one ball and avoids a scratch?

My guess is Yes, perhaps with $\epsilon = \frac{1}{2}$ (and unit-radius balls). And maybe there is always a shot that sinks all $15$ balls!?

$\mathfrak{Merry}$ $\mathfrak{Christmas!}$

     Grinch_detail

      Chuck Jones Gallery.