I could never, for the life of me, recall the definition of a root system in Lie theory. It probably doesn't help that I've never taken a course on Lie Theory - the algebra, or the groups, or the differential geometry - even though I was at one of the best universities at the country. But then again, I was young, and had much else on my mind, like a mother who had been driven insane by the theft of her property. Which might explain my sympathy for the Palestinian cause. But doesn't, because that is, like the former, simply a question of justice.

The definition of a root system, I find - if not others, is easily forgettable. However, recently I discovered that root systems were an example of a quandle, the axioms of which go back to Mituhisa Takasaki in 1942, and simply axiomatise the properties of conjugation in groups. I found this useful nugget in the book, Quandles, An Introduction to the Algebra of Knots by Mohammed Elhamdadi and Sam Nelson.

Would it then, not be useful, to include this in a discussion of Lie algebras and their classification?

edit

@Noah Schweber: I've seen papers that relate personal anecdotes. For example, a paper titled Much Ado about Nothing on the zeros of some system. If it's good enough for them, it's good enough for me.

@Darij Grinberg: A typo...that's easily fixed. Who are you insulting? That's not what I'm asking here. I'm curious about how to make mathematics easier to learn, similarly as Voevodsky was. Important precedent.

I could never, for the life of me, recall the definition of a root system in Lie theory. It probably doesn't help that I've never taken a course on Lie Theory - the algebra, or the groups, or the differential geometry - even though I was at one of the best universities at the country.

The definition of a root system, I find - if not others, is easily forgettable. However, recently I discovered that root systems were an example of a quandle, the axioms of which go back to Mituhisa Takasaki in 1942, and simply axiomatise the properties of conjugation in groups. I found this useful nugget in the book, Quandles, An Introduction to the Algebra of Knots by Mohammed Elhamdadi and Sam Nelson.

Would it then, not be useful, to include this in a discussion of Lie algebras and their classification?

I could never, for the life of me, recall the definition of a root system in Lie theory. It probably doesn't help that I've never taken a course on Lie Theory - the algebra, or the groups, or the differential geometry - even though I was at one of the best universities at the country. But then again, I was young, and had much else on my mind, like a mother who had been driven insane by the theft of her property. Which might explain my sympathy for the Palestian cause. But doesn't, because that is, like the former, simply a question of justice.

The definition of a root system, I find - if not others, is easily forgettable. However, recently I discovered that root systems were an example of a quandle, the axioms of which go back to Mituhisa Takasaki in 1942, and simply axiomatise the properties of conjugation in groups. I found this useful nugget in the book, Quandles, An Introduction to the Algebra of Knots by Mohammed Elhamdadi and Sam Nelson.

Would it then, not be useful, to include this in a discussion of Lie algebras and their classification?

I could never, for the life of me, recall the definition of a root system in Lie theory. It probably doesn't help that I've never taken a course on Lie Theory - the algebra, or the groups, or the differential geometry - even though I was at one of the best universities at the country. But then again, I was young, and had much else on my mind, like a mother who had been driven insane by the theft of her property. Which might explain my sympathy for the Palestinian cause. But doesn't, because that is, like the former, simply a question of justice.

The definition of a root system, I find - if not others, is easily forgettable. However, recently I discovered that root systems were an example of a quandle, the axioms of which go back to Mituhisa Takasaki in 1942, and simply axiomatise the properties of conjugation in groups. I found this useful nugget in the book, Quandles, An Introduction to the Algebra of Knots by Mohammed Elhamdadi and Sam Nelson.

Would it then, not be useful, to include this in a discussion of Lie algebras and their classification?

edit

@Noah Schweber: I've seen papers that relate personal anecdotes. For example, a paper titled Much Ado about Nothing on the zeros of some system. If it's good enough for them, it's good enough for me.

@Darij Grinberg: A typo...that's easily fixed. Who are you insulting? That's not what I'm asking here. I'm curious about how to make mathematics easier to learn, similarly as Voevodsky was. Important precedent.