Skip to main content
formatting, added top-level tag
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

I$\DeclareMathOperator{\Fix}{\operatorname{Fix}}$I am looking for any reference regarding the following problem:

Problem: Consider a smooth almost-free action of $S^1$ on a smooth sphere $S^n$. Then for all finite subgroups $\mathbb{Z}_m\subseteq S^1$, the fixed point set $Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)\subseteq S^n$$\Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)\subseteq S^n$ is either empty or a rational homology sphere.

This is well-known to be true when the action is linear, or by Smith theory when $m=p^k$ is the power of a prime $p$.

A stronger statement would be that for every action of $\mathbb{Z}_m$ on a sphere $S^n$, the fixed point set $Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)$$\Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ is a rational homology sphere. What I know is that when $m$ is not the power of a prime, then $Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)$$\Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ is not necessarily a smooth sphere, but I have not found any indication about its possible (rational) homotopy types.

What boggles me the most is that, I had imagined this problem to either well known to be true, or well known to be false, or extremely interesting - however, I have not found any evidence for any of these.

I am looking for any reference regarding the following problem:

Problem: Consider a smooth almost-free action of $S^1$ on a smooth sphere $S^n$. Then for all finite subgroups $\mathbb{Z}_m\subseteq S^1$, the fixed point set $Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)\subseteq S^n$ is either empty or a rational homology sphere.

This is well-known to be true when the action is linear, or by Smith theory when $m=p^k$ is the power of a prime $p$.

A stronger statement would be that for every action of $\mathbb{Z}_m$ on a sphere $S^n$, the fixed point set $Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ is a rational homology sphere. What I know is that when $m$ is not the power of a prime, then $Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ is not necessarily a smooth sphere, but I have not found any indication about its possible (rational) homotopy types.

What boggles me the most is that, I had imagined this problem to either well known to be true, or well known to be false, or extremely interesting - however, I have not found any evidence for any of these.

$\DeclareMathOperator{\Fix}{\operatorname{Fix}}$I am looking for any reference regarding the following problem:

Problem: Consider a smooth almost-free action of $S^1$ on a smooth sphere $S^n$. Then for all finite subgroups $\mathbb{Z}_m\subseteq S^1$, the fixed point set $\Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)\subseteq S^n$ is either empty or a rational homology sphere.

This is well-known to be true when the action is linear, or by Smith theory when $m=p^k$ is the power of a prime $p$.

A stronger statement would be that for every action of $\mathbb{Z}_m$ on a sphere $S^n$, the fixed point set $\Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ is a rational homology sphere. What I know is that when $m$ is not the power of a prime, then $\Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ is not necessarily a smooth sphere, but I have not found any indication about its possible (rational) homotopy types.

What boggles me the most is that, I had imagined this problem to either well known to be true, or well known to be false, or extremely interesting however, I have not found any evidence for any of these.

Source Link
CuriousUser
  • 1.5k
  • 12
  • 22

Almost free circle actions on spheres

I am looking for any reference regarding the following problem:

Problem: Consider a smooth almost-free action of $S^1$ on a smooth sphere $S^n$. Then for all finite subgroups $\mathbb{Z}_m\subseteq S^1$, the fixed point set $Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)\subseteq S^n$ is either empty or a rational homology sphere.

This is well-known to be true when the action is linear, or by Smith theory when $m=p^k$ is the power of a prime $p$.

A stronger statement would be that for every action of $\mathbb{Z}_m$ on a sphere $S^n$, the fixed point set $Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ is a rational homology sphere. What I know is that when $m$ is not the power of a prime, then $Fix(\mathbb{Z}_m)$ is not necessarily a smooth sphere, but I have not found any indication about its possible (rational) homotopy types.

What boggles me the most is that, I had imagined this problem to either well known to be true, or well known to be false, or extremely interesting - however, I have not found any evidence for any of these.