Skip to main content
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
LWW
  • 663
  • 3
  • 12

In p.312 of 'Rhoades, Robert C., Linear relations among Poincaré series via harmonic weak Maass forms. Ramanujan J. 29 (2012), no. 1-3, 311–320', the author defines the extended principal part at infinity as follows:

A weakly holomorhpic modular form is any meromorhpic modular form whose poles are supported at the cusps. The extended principal part at infinity of a weakly holomorphic modular form $f$ is the polynomial $P_{f,\infty} \in \mathbb C[q^{-1}]$ such that $f(z)-P_{f,\infty}(q^{-1}) = O(e^{-\epsilon y})$ as $y \to \infty$.

My questions are,

  1. what is the meaning of the extended principal part.
  2. What's the relation of this definition of extended principal part and the 'principal part of Laurent expansion'?
  3. Is the extended principal part of weakly holomorphic modular form determined uniquely?

In addition, the author defines the extended principal part at the cusps $x$ as follows:

If $x$ is a cusp, the extended principal part at $x$ is the finite sum of terms in the Fourier expansion around $x$ that do not have rapid decay toward $x$.

I didn't understand this sentence, but in my idea the natural definition of the extended principal part at $x$ is the following:

Let $\sigma \in \mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb R)$ be thean element satisfying $\sigma x = \infty$. Then $f|_k \sigma^{-1}$ has the Fourier expansion in $q$, where $q=e(z/h)$, $h$ is the cusp width at $x$. The extended principal part of $f$ at $x$ is a polynomial $P_{f,x}(q^{-1}) \in \mathbb C[q^{-1}]$ such that $f|_k \sigma^{-1} (z)-P_{f,x}(q^{-1}) = O(e^{-\epsilon y})$.

Is my understanding right?

In p.312 of 'Rhoades, Robert C., Linear relations among Poincaré series via harmonic weak Maass forms. Ramanujan J. 29 (2012), no. 1-3, 311–320', the author defines the extended principal part at infinity as follows:

A weakly holomorhpic modular form is any meromorhpic modular form whose poles are supported at the cusps. The extended principal part at infinity of a weakly holomorphic modular form $f$ is the polynomial $P_{f,\infty} \in \mathbb C[q^{-1}]$ such that $f(z)-P_{f,\infty}(q^{-1}) = O(e^{-\epsilon y})$ as $y \to \infty$.

My questions are,

  1. what is the meaning of the extended principal part.
  2. What's the relation of this definition of extended principal part and the 'principal part of Laurent expansion'?
  3. Is the extended principal part of weakly holomorphic modular form determined uniquely?

In addition, the author defines the extended principal part at the cusps $x$ as follows:

If $x$ is a cusp, the extended principal part at $x$ is the finite sum of terms in the Fourier expansion around $x$ that do not have rapid decay toward $x$.

I didn't understand this sentence, but in my idea the natural definition of the extended principal part at $x$ is the following:

Let $\sigma \in \mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb R)$ be the element satisfying $\sigma x = \infty$. Then $f|_k \sigma^{-1}$ has the Fourier expansion in $q$, where $q=e(z/h)$, $h$ is the cusp width at $x$. The extended principal part of $f$ at $x$ is a polynomial $P_{f,x}(q^{-1}) \in \mathbb C[q^{-1}]$ such that $f|_k \sigma^{-1} (z)-P_{f,x}(q^{-1}) = O(e^{-\epsilon y})$.

Is my understanding right?

In p.312 of 'Rhoades, Robert C., Linear relations among Poincaré series via harmonic weak Maass forms. Ramanujan J. 29 (2012), no. 1-3, 311–320', the author defines the extended principal part at infinity as follows:

A weakly holomorhpic modular form is any meromorhpic modular form whose poles are supported at the cusps. The extended principal part at infinity of a weakly holomorphic modular form $f$ is the polynomial $P_{f,\infty} \in \mathbb C[q^{-1}]$ such that $f(z)-P_{f,\infty}(q^{-1}) = O(e^{-\epsilon y})$ as $y \to \infty$.

My questions are,

  1. what is the meaning of the extended principal part.
  2. What's the relation of this definition of extended principal part and the 'principal part of Laurent expansion'?
  3. Is the extended principal part of weakly holomorphic modular form determined uniquely?

In addition, the author defines the extended principal part at the cusps $x$ as follows:

If $x$ is a cusp, the extended principal part at $x$ is the finite sum of terms in the Fourier expansion around $x$ that do not have rapid decay toward $x$.

I didn't understand this sentence, but in my idea the natural definition of the extended principal part at $x$ is the following:

Let $\sigma \in \mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb R)$ be an element satisfying $\sigma x = \infty$. Then $f|_k \sigma^{-1}$ has the Fourier expansion in $q$, where $q=e(z/h)$, $h$ is the cusp width at $x$. The extended principal part of $f$ at $x$ is a polynomial $P_{f,x}(q^{-1}) \in \mathbb C[q^{-1}]$ such that $f|_k \sigma^{-1} (z)-P_{f,x}(q^{-1}) = O(e^{-\epsilon y})$.

Is my understanding right?

Source Link
LWW
  • 663
  • 3
  • 12

Meaning of extended principal part of weakly holomorhpic modular forms

In p.312 of 'Rhoades, Robert C., Linear relations among Poincaré series via harmonic weak Maass forms. Ramanujan J. 29 (2012), no. 1-3, 311–320', the author defines the extended principal part at infinity as follows:

A weakly holomorhpic modular form is any meromorhpic modular form whose poles are supported at the cusps. The extended principal part at infinity of a weakly holomorphic modular form $f$ is the polynomial $P_{f,\infty} \in \mathbb C[q^{-1}]$ such that $f(z)-P_{f,\infty}(q^{-1}) = O(e^{-\epsilon y})$ as $y \to \infty$.

My questions are,

  1. what is the meaning of the extended principal part.
  2. What's the relation of this definition of extended principal part and the 'principal part of Laurent expansion'?
  3. Is the extended principal part of weakly holomorphic modular form determined uniquely?

In addition, the author defines the extended principal part at the cusps $x$ as follows:

If $x$ is a cusp, the extended principal part at $x$ is the finite sum of terms in the Fourier expansion around $x$ that do not have rapid decay toward $x$.

I didn't understand this sentence, but in my idea the natural definition of the extended principal part at $x$ is the following:

Let $\sigma \in \mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb R)$ be the element satisfying $\sigma x = \infty$. Then $f|_k \sigma^{-1}$ has the Fourier expansion in $q$, where $q=e(z/h)$, $h$ is the cusp width at $x$. The extended principal part of $f$ at $x$ is a polynomial $P_{f,x}(q^{-1}) \in \mathbb C[q^{-1}]$ such that $f|_k \sigma^{-1} (z)-P_{f,x}(q^{-1}) = O(e^{-\epsilon y})$.

Is my understanding right?