Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286
Fix TeX. This is not a vertically centered \sum-like large operator, which is what \mathop constructs.; deleted 22 characters in body
Source Link
Emil Jeřábek
  • 47.1k
  • 4
  • 147
  • 208

Expressing $-\mathop{\mathrm\operatorname{adj}}(A)$ as a polynomial in $A$?

Suppose $A\in R^{n\times n}$, where $R$ is a commutative ring. Let $p_i \in R$ be the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of $A$: $\mathop{\mathrm{det}}(A-xI) = p_0 + p_1x + \dots + p_n x^n$$\operatorname{det}(A-xI) = p_0 + p_1x + \dots + p_n x^n$.

I

I am looking for a proof that: $-\mathop{\mathrm{adj}}(A) = p_1 I + p_2 A + \dots + p_n A^{n-1}$$-\operatorname{adj}(A) = p_1 I + p_2 A + \dots + p_n A^{n-1}$.
In

In the case where $\mathop{\mathrm{det}}(A)$$\operatorname{det}(A)$ is a unit, $A$ is invertible, and the proof follows from the Cayley-HamiltonCayley–Hamilton theorem. But what about the case where $A$ is not invertible?

Expressing $-\mathop{\mathrm{adj}}(A)$ as a polynomial in $A$?

Suppose $A\in R^{n\times n}$, where $R$ is a commutative ring. Let $p_i \in R$ be the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of $A$: $\mathop{\mathrm{det}}(A-xI) = p_0 + p_1x + \dots + p_n x^n$.

I am looking for a proof that: $-\mathop{\mathrm{adj}}(A) = p_1 I + p_2 A + \dots + p_n A^{n-1}$.
In the case where $\mathop{\mathrm{det}}(A)$ is a unit, $A$ is invertible, and the proof follows from the Cayley-Hamilton theorem. But what about the case where $A$ is not invertible?

Expressing $-\operatorname{adj}(A)$ as a polynomial in $A$?

Suppose $A\in R^{n\times n}$, where $R$ is a commutative ring. Let $p_i \in R$ be the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of $A$: $\operatorname{det}(A-xI) = p_0 + p_1x + \dots + p_n x^n$.

I am looking for a proof that $-\operatorname{adj}(A) = p_1 I + p_2 A + \dots + p_n A^{n-1}$.

In the case where $\operatorname{det}(A)$ is a unit, $A$ is invertible, and the proof follows from the Cayley–Hamilton theorem. But what about the case where $A$ is not invertible?

edited title
Link
Denis Serre
  • 52.3k
  • 10
  • 146
  • 300

Expressing adj$-\mathop{\mathrm{adj}}(A)$ as a polynomial in A$A$?

tags
Source Link
darij grinberg
  • 33.8k
  • 4
  • 118
  • 253
Loading
Rollback to Revision 5
Source Link
user9072
user9072
Loading
minor typo fix
Source Link
darij grinberg
  • 33.8k
  • 4
  • 118
  • 253
Loading
edited tags
Link
Harry Gindi
  • 19.6k
  • 16
  • 123
  • 215
Loading
restored original tags
Link
Tom Church
  • 8.2k
  • 1
  • 41
  • 51
Loading
edited tags
Link
Harry Gindi
  • 19.6k
  • 16
  • 123
  • 215
Loading
Source Link
Loading