Skip to main content
formatting
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Let$\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$Let $H$ be a Hilbert space, and $X \in B(H)$ a proper isometry (i.e. $X^{\star}X = id$$X^{\star}X = \id$ and $XX^{\star} \neq id$$XX^{\star} \neq \id$). Coburn's theorem states that ${\rm C}^{\star}(X)$, the ${\rm C}^{\star}$-algebra generated by $X$, is the Toeplitz algebra.

We are interested in an extension of Coburn's theorem. Consider $Y \in B(H)$ such that $Y^{\star}Y = id+p$$Y^{\star}Y = \id+p$, with $p \in B(H)$ a nonzero projection (so $YY^{\star} \neq id$$YY^{\star} \neq \id$, see comments).

Question: Is ${\rm C}^{\star}(Y)$ always the Toeplitz algebra? If not, is it still a ${\rm C}^{\star}$-algebra of type ${\rm I}$?

Motivation: I'm mainly interested in a shift on a trivalent directed tree with one parent and one or two children for each vertex, such that the associated operator is non-normal; it is a generalization of the operator $S^{\star}$ of this post. These questions were inspired by the Collatz graph, in particular, the connected component of an eventual counter-example of Collatz Conjecture going to infinity by the Collatz map iteration (such a connected component would be a trivalent directed tree). The Collatz map induces a shift operator which generates an operator algebra (${\rm C}^{\star}$ or ${\rm W}^{\star}$). I wonder whether this operator algebra is interesting in its own right or for an application to number theory.

Let $H$ be a Hilbert space, and $X \in B(H)$ a proper isometry (i.e. $X^{\star}X = id$ and $XX^{\star} \neq id$). Coburn's theorem states that ${\rm C}^{\star}(X)$, the ${\rm C}^{\star}$-algebra generated by $X$, is the Toeplitz algebra.

We are interested in an extension of Coburn's theorem. Consider $Y \in B(H)$ such that $Y^{\star}Y = id+p$, with $p \in B(H)$ a nonzero projection (so $YY^{\star} \neq id$, see comments).

Question: Is ${\rm C}^{\star}(Y)$ always the Toeplitz algebra? If not, is it still a ${\rm C}^{\star}$-algebra of type ${\rm I}$?

Motivation: I'm mainly interested in a shift on a trivalent directed tree with one parent and one or two children for each vertex, such that the associated operator is non-normal; it is a generalization of the operator $S^{\star}$ of this post. These questions were inspired by the Collatz graph, in particular, the connected component of an eventual counter-example of Collatz Conjecture going to infinity by the Collatz map iteration (such a connected component would be a trivalent directed tree). The Collatz map induces a shift operator which generates an operator algebra (${\rm C}^{\star}$ or ${\rm W}^{\star}$). I wonder whether this operator algebra is interesting in its own right or for an application to number theory.

$\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$Let $H$ be a Hilbert space, and $X \in B(H)$ a proper isometry (i.e. $X^{\star}X = \id$ and $XX^{\star} \neq \id$). Coburn's theorem states that ${\rm C}^{\star}(X)$, the ${\rm C}^{\star}$-algebra generated by $X$, is the Toeplitz algebra.

We are interested in an extension of Coburn's theorem. Consider $Y \in B(H)$ such that $Y^{\star}Y = \id+p$, with $p \in B(H)$ a nonzero projection (so $YY^{\star} \neq \id$, see comments).

Question: Is ${\rm C}^{\star}(Y)$ always the Toeplitz algebra? If not, is it still a ${\rm C}^{\star}$-algebra of type ${\rm I}$?

Motivation: I'm mainly interested in a shift on a trivalent directed tree with one parent and one or two children for each vertex, such that the associated operator is non-normal; it is a generalization of the operator $S^{\star}$ of this post. These questions were inspired by the Collatz graph, in particular, the connected component of an eventual counter-example of Collatz Conjecture going to infinity by the Collatz map iteration (such a connected component would be a trivalent directed tree). The Collatz map induces a shift operator which generates an operator algebra (${\rm C}^{\star}$ or ${\rm W}^{\star}$). I wonder whether this operator algebra is interesting in its own right or for an application to number theory.

changed "interested" to "interesting" (and other change to reach min chars)
Source Link

Let $H$ be a Hilbert space, and $X \in B(H)$ a proper isometry (i.e. $X^{\star}X = id$ and $XX^{\star} \neq id$). Coburn's theorem states that ${\rm C}^{\star}(X)$, the ${\rm C}^{\star}$-algebra generated by $X$, is the Toeplitz algebra.

We are interested in an extension of Coburn's theorem. Consider $Y \in B(H)$ such that $Y^{\star}Y = id+p$, with $p \in B(H)$ a nonzero projection (so $YY^{\star} \neq id$, see comments).

Question: Is ${\rm C}^{\star}(Y)$ always the Toeplitz algebra? If not, is it still a ${\rm C}^{\star}$-algebra of type ${\rm I}$?

Motivation: I'm mainly interested in a shift on a trivalent directed tree with one parent and one or two children for each vertex, such that the associated operator is non-normal; it is a generalization of the operator $S^{\star}$ of this post. These questions were inspired by the Collatz graph, in particular, the connected component of an eventual counter-example of Collatz Conjecture going to infinity by the Collatz map iteration (such a connected component would be a trivalent directed tree). The Collatz map induces a shift operator which generates an operator algebra (${\rm C}^{\star}$ or ${\rm W}^{\star}$). I wonder whether this operator algebra is interested for itselfinteresting in its own right or for an application to number theory.

Let $H$ be a Hilbert space, and $X \in B(H)$ a proper isometry (i.e. $X^{\star}X = id$ and $XX^{\star} \neq id$). Coburn's theorem states that ${\rm C}^{\star}(X)$, the ${\rm C}^{\star}$-algebra generated by $X$, is the Toeplitz algebra.

We are interested in an extension of Coburn's theorem. Consider $Y \in B(H)$ such that $Y^{\star}Y = id+p$, with $p \in B(H)$ a nonzero projection (so $YY^{\star} \neq id$, see comments).

Question: Is ${\rm C}^{\star}(Y)$ always the Toeplitz algebra? If not, is it still a ${\rm C}^{\star}$-algebra of type ${\rm I}$?

Motivation: I'm mainly interested in a shift on a trivalent directed tree with one parent and one or two children for each vertex, such that the associated operator is non-normal; it is a generalization of the operator $S^{\star}$ of this post. These questions were inspired by the Collatz graph, in particular, the connected component of an eventual counter-example of Collatz Conjecture going to infinity by the Collatz map iteration (such a connected component would be a trivalent directed tree). The Collatz map induces a shift operator which generates an operator algebra (${\rm C}^{\star}$ or ${\rm W}^{\star}$). I wonder whether this operator algebra is interested for itself or for an application to number theory.

Let $H$ be a Hilbert space, and $X \in B(H)$ a proper isometry (i.e. $X^{\star}X = id$ and $XX^{\star} \neq id$). Coburn's theorem states that ${\rm C}^{\star}(X)$, the ${\rm C}^{\star}$-algebra generated by $X$, is the Toeplitz algebra.

We are interested in an extension of Coburn's theorem. Consider $Y \in B(H)$ such that $Y^{\star}Y = id+p$, with $p \in B(H)$ a nonzero projection (so $YY^{\star} \neq id$, see comments).

Question: Is ${\rm C}^{\star}(Y)$ always the Toeplitz algebra? If not, is it still a ${\rm C}^{\star}$-algebra of type ${\rm I}$?

Motivation: I'm mainly interested in a shift on a trivalent directed tree with one parent and one or two children for each vertex, such that the associated operator is non-normal; it is a generalization of the operator $S^{\star}$ of this post. These questions were inspired by the Collatz graph, in particular, the connected component of an eventual counter-example of Collatz Conjecture going to infinity by the Collatz map iteration (such a connected component would be a trivalent directed tree). The Collatz map induces a shift operator which generates an operator algebra (${\rm C}^{\star}$ or ${\rm W}^{\star}$). I wonder whether this operator algebra is interesting in its own right or for an application to number theory.

tag edit
Link
Sebastien Palcoux
  • 27k
  • 5
  • 74
  • 186

Extension of Coburn's theorem abouton isometry and Toeplitz algebra

Collatz inspiration
Source Link
Sebastien Palcoux
  • 27k
  • 5
  • 74
  • 186
Loading
attempt of clarification
Source Link
Sebastien Palcoux
  • 27k
  • 5
  • 74
  • 186
Loading
Source Link
Sebastien Palcoux
  • 27k
  • 5
  • 74
  • 186
Loading