Skip to main content
+ top level tag (nt.)
Link
Myshkin
  • 17.6k
  • 5
  • 71
  • 137
Better exhibition
Source Link
R.P.
  • 4.7k
  • 19
  • 43
  • 67

For a totally real (resp. imaginary) biquadratic number field $K$ with quadratic sub fieldssubfields $K_1$, $K_2$ and $K_3$, is there an explicit method to determine Hasse unit index $(U_K:U_{K_1}U_{K_2}U_{K_3})$?

For a totally real (resp. imaginary) biquadratic number field $K$ with quadratic sub fields $K_1$, $K_2$ and $K_3$, is there an explicit method to determine Hasse unit index $(U_K:U_{K_1}U_{K_2}U_{K_3})$?

For a totally real (resp. imaginary) biquadratic number field $K$ with quadratic subfields $K_1$, $K_2$ and $K_3$, is there an explicit method to determine Hasse unit index $(U_K:U_{K_1}U_{K_2}U_{K_3})$?

For a totally real (resp. imaginary) biquadratic number field K$K$ with quadratic subfields K_1sub fields $K_1$,K_2 $K_2$ and K_3$K_3$, is there an expliciteexplicit method to determine Hasse unit index (U_K:U_{K_1}U_{K_2}U_{K_3})$(U_K:U_{K_1}U_{K_2}U_{K_3})$?

For a totally real (resp. imaginary) biquadratic number field K with quadratic subfields K_1,K_2 and K_3, is there an explicite method to determine Hasse unit index (U_K:U_{K_1}U_{K_2}U_{K_3})?

For a totally real (resp. imaginary) biquadratic number field $K$ with quadratic sub fields $K_1$, $K_2$ and $K_3$, is there an explicit method to determine Hasse unit index $(U_K:U_{K_1}U_{K_2}U_{K_3})$?

Source Link
Loading