Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286
edited body
Source Link
EM90
  • 329
  • 1
  • 7

Consider the surface group $\Gamma=\langle a,b,c,d\mid [a,b][c,d]=1\rangle$: it is a Gromov hyperbolic group; its Gromov boundary $\partial\Gamma$ is homeomorphic to $S^1$ (the unit circle). I would like to define a famlilyfamily of subsets of $\partial\Gamma$ as follows: fix $x,y\in\Gamma$. Then $$ U(x,y):=\left\{\xi\in\partial\Gamma\mid\text{ there exixts a geodesic }g\text{ in }\Gamma\text{ starting from }x,\text{ passing through }y\text{ and s.t. }g(\infty)=\xi\right\}. $$$$ U(x,y):=\left\{\xi\in\partial\Gamma\mid\text{ there exists a geodesic }g\text{ in }\Gamma\text{ starting from }x,\text{ passing through }y\text{ and s.t. }g(\infty)=\xi\right\}. $$

  1. Does this definition make sense? Is $U(x,y)$ trivial?
  2. Is $U(x,y)$ open?
  3. Is $U(x,y)$ connected?

Consider the surface group $\Gamma=\langle a,b,c,d\mid [a,b][c,d]=1\rangle$: it is a Gromov hyperbolic group; its Gromov boundary $\partial\Gamma$ is homeomorphic to $S^1$ (the unit circle). I would like to define a famlily of subsets of $\partial\Gamma$ as follows: fix $x,y\in\Gamma$. Then $$ U(x,y):=\left\{\xi\in\partial\Gamma\mid\text{ there exixts a geodesic }g\text{ in }\Gamma\text{ starting from }x,\text{ passing through }y\text{ and s.t. }g(\infty)=\xi\right\}. $$

  1. Does this definition make sense? Is $U(x,y)$ trivial?
  2. Is $U(x,y)$ open?
  3. Is $U(x,y)$ connected?

Consider the surface group $\Gamma=\langle a,b,c,d\mid [a,b][c,d]=1\rangle$: it is a Gromov hyperbolic group; its Gromov boundary $\partial\Gamma$ is homeomorphic to $S^1$ (the unit circle). I would like to define a family of subsets of $\partial\Gamma$ as follows: fix $x,y\in\Gamma$. Then $$ U(x,y):=\left\{\xi\in\partial\Gamma\mid\text{ there exists a geodesic }g\text{ in }\Gamma\text{ starting from }x,\text{ passing through }y\text{ and s.t. }g(\infty)=\xi\right\}. $$

  1. Does this definition make sense? Is $U(x,y)$ trivial?
  2. Is $U(x,y)$ open?
  3. Is $U(x,y)$ connected?
Source Link
EM90
  • 329
  • 1
  • 7

Subsets of the boundary of a surface group

Consider the surface group $\Gamma=\langle a,b,c,d\mid [a,b][c,d]=1\rangle$: it is a Gromov hyperbolic group; its Gromov boundary $\partial\Gamma$ is homeomorphic to $S^1$ (the unit circle). I would like to define a famlily of subsets of $\partial\Gamma$ as follows: fix $x,y\in\Gamma$. Then $$ U(x,y):=\left\{\xi\in\partial\Gamma\mid\text{ there exixts a geodesic }g\text{ in }\Gamma\text{ starting from }x,\text{ passing through }y\text{ and s.t. }g(\infty)=\xi\right\}. $$

  1. Does this definition make sense? Is $U(x,y)$ trivial?
  2. Is $U(x,y)$ open?
  3. Is $U(x,y)$ connected?