Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

edited tags
Link
Ievgeni
Ievgeni
  • 215
  • 3
  • 11
edited body
Source Link
Ievgeni
Ievgeni
  • 215
  • 3
  • 11

In this paper : https://eprint.iacr.org/2011/501.pdf There is an equality page 10, in the second paragraph considered by the authors as "easy to check". If someone could explain to me why the set at the left side is included atin the set ofat the right side, I will be the happiest man on earth. All the definitions are given in the same page.

In this paper : https://eprint.iacr.org/2011/501.pdf There is an equality page 10, in the second paragraph considered by the authors as "easy to check". If someone could explain to me why the set at the left side is included at the set of the right side, I will be the happiest man on earth. All the definitions are given in the same page.

In this paper : https://eprint.iacr.org/2011/501.pdf There is an equality page 10, in the second paragraph considered by the authors as "easy to check". If someone could explain to me why the set at the left side is included in the set at the right side, I will be the happiest man on earth. All the definitions are given in the same page.

Source Link
Ievgeni
Ievgeni
  • 215
  • 3
  • 11

Dual lattices up to a q scaling factor

In this paper : https://eprint.iacr.org/2011/501.pdf There is an equality page 10, in the second paragraph considered by the authors as "easy to check". If someone could explain to me why the set at the left side is included at the set of the right side, I will be the happiest man on earth. All the definitions are given in the same page.