Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

Question Protected by Felipe Voloch
added a link
Source Link
Suvrit
Suvrit
  • 28.6k
  • 7
  • 82
  • 150

According to Marker's "Model Theory: An Introduction""Model Theory: An Introduction", the real exponential field has a $\forall\exists$ axiomatization (because it is model complete) but no-one has any idea what such an axiomatization might look like. Has any progress been made on this since the early 2000s when Marker wrote this?

According to Marker's "Model Theory: An Introduction", the real exponential field has a $\forall\exists$ axiomatization (because it is model complete) but no-one has any idea what such an axiomatization might look like. Has any progress been made on this since the early 2000s when Marker wrote this?

According to Marker's "Model Theory: An Introduction", the real exponential field has a $\forall\exists$ axiomatization (because it is model complete) but no-one has any idea what such an axiomatization might look like. Has any progress been made on this since the early 2000s when Marker wrote this?

Source Link
Rob Arthan
Rob Arthan
  • 879
  • 4
  • 13

Axiomatizations of the real exponential field

According to Marker's "Model Theory: An Introduction", the real exponential field has a $\forall\exists$ axiomatization (because it is model complete) but no-one has any idea what such an axiomatization might look like. Has any progress been made on this since the early 2000s when Marker wrote this?