Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Notice added Draw attention by timur
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by timur
added 45 characters in body
Source Link
timur
  • 3.3k
  • 1
  • 36
  • 42

For $1\leq p\leq\infty$, the $r$-th order $L^p$-modulus of smoothness is \begin{equation} \omega_r(u,t,\Omega)_p=\sup_{|h|\leq t}\|\Delta_h^ru\|_{L^p(\Omega_{rh})} \end{equation} where $\Omega_{rh}=\{x\in\Omega:[x+rh]\subset\Omega\}$, and $\Delta_h^r$ is the $r$-th order forward difference operator defined recursively by $[\Delta_h^1u](x)=u(x+h)-u(x)$ and $\Delta_h^ku=\Delta_h^1(\Delta_h^{k-1})u$, i.e., \begin{equation} \Delta_h^ru (x) = \sum_{k=0}^r (-1)^{r+k} \binom{r}{k} u(x+kh). \end{equation} For $1\leq p,q\leq\infty$, $\alpha\geq0$, and $r>0$ an integer, let us define $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}(\Omega)$ as the space of functions $u\in L^p(\Omega)$ for which \begin{equation} |u|_{B^\alpha_{p,q;r}(\Omega)} = \big( \int_0^\infty|t^{-\alpha}\omega_r(u,t,\Omega)_p|^q \frac{\mathrm{d}t}t \big)^{1/q} < \infty, \end{equation} with the usual modifications for $q=\infty$. If $\alpha>r$ then the space $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}$ is trivial in the sense that $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}=\mathbb{P}_{r-1}$, the polynomials of order $r$. On the other hand, so long as $r>\alpha$, different choices of $r$ will result in norms that are equivalent to each other, and in this case we have the classical Besov spaces $B^\alpha_{p,q}(\Omega)=B^\alpha_{p,q;r}(\Omega)$. The reason for this is the so-called Marchaud inequalities.

My question concerns the borderline case $r=\alpha$. In this case, the situation seems to depend on the index $q$. Can you please confirm or invalidate the followings? Reference suggestions are also very welcome.

  • If $1\leq q<\infty$ and $\alpha=r$, then $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}=\mathbb{P}_{r-1}$.
  • The case $q=\infty$ gives nontrivial spaces. Namely, we have $B^\alpha_{p,\infty;\alpha}(\Omega)=W^{\alpha,p}(\Omega)$ for $p>1$, and $B^\alpha_{1,\infty;\alpha}(\Omega)$ consists of those functions whose derivatives of order up to $\alpha-1$ are in $BV(\Omega)$.

For the one dimensional case, the second item is proved on page 53 of Constructive Approximation by DeVore and Lorentz. I have not checked but suspect that the same proof works in multi-dimensions, with $BV(\Omega)=B^1_{1,\infty;1}(\Omega)$ now taken as a definition.

Now, what puzzles me is that on page 202 of Rational approximation of real functions by Petrushev and Popov, it is claimed that $B^\alpha_{p,p;\alpha}(\Omega)$ is nontrivial, which seems to contradict the first item above.

I am also interested in the full range $p,q>0$ involving quasi-Banach spaces. Here the borderline case would be given by $r=\alpha-\max\{0,\frac1p-1\}$.

For $1\leq p\leq\infty$, the $r$-th order $L^p$-modulus of smoothness is \begin{equation} \omega_r(u,t,\Omega)_p=\sup_{|h|\leq t}\|\Delta_h^ru\|_{L^p(\Omega_{rh})} \end{equation} where $\Omega_{rh}=\{x\in\Omega:[x+rh]\subset\Omega\}$, and $\Delta_h^r$ is the $r$-th order forward difference operator defined recursively by $[\Delta_h^1u](x)=u(x+h)-u(x)$ and $\Delta_h^ku=\Delta_h^1(\Delta_h^{k-1})u$, i.e., \begin{equation} \Delta_h^ru (x) = \sum_{k=0}^r (-1)^{r+k} \binom{r}{k} u(x+kh). \end{equation} For $1\leq p,q\leq\infty$, $\alpha\geq0$, and $r>0$ an integer, let us define $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}(\Omega)$ as the space of functions $u\in L^p(\Omega)$ for which \begin{equation} |u|_{B^\alpha_{p,q;r}(\Omega)} = \big( \int_0^\infty|t^{-\alpha}\omega_r(u,t,\Omega)_p|^q \frac{\mathrm{d}t}t \big)^{1/q} < \infty, \end{equation} with the usual modifications for $q=\infty$. If $\alpha>r$ then the space $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}$ is trivial in the sense that $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}=\mathbb{P}_{r-1}$, the polynomials of order $r$. On the other hand, so long as $r>\alpha$, different choices of $r$ will result in norms that are equivalent to each other, and in this case we have the classical Besov spaces $B^\alpha_{p,q}(\Omega)=B^\alpha_{p,q;r}(\Omega)$. The reason for this is the so-called Marchaud inequalities.

My question concerns the borderline case $r=\alpha$. In this case, the situation seems to depend on the index $q$. Can you please confirm or invalidate the followings?

  • If $1\leq q<\infty$ and $\alpha=r$, then $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}=\mathbb{P}_{r-1}$.
  • The case $q=\infty$ gives nontrivial spaces. Namely, we have $B^\alpha_{p,\infty;\alpha}(\Omega)=W^{\alpha,p}(\Omega)$ for $p>1$, and $B^\alpha_{1,\infty;\alpha}(\Omega)$ consists of those functions whose derivatives of order up to $\alpha-1$ are in $BV(\Omega)$.

For the one dimensional case, the second item is proved on page 53 of Constructive Approximation by DeVore and Lorentz. I have not checked but suspect that the same proof works in multi-dimensions, with $BV(\Omega)=B^1_{1,\infty;1}(\Omega)$ now taken as a definition.

Now, what puzzles me is that on page 202 of Rational approximation of real functions by Petrushev and Popov, it is claimed that $B^\alpha_{p,p;\alpha}(\Omega)$ is nontrivial, which seems to contradict the first item above.

I am also interested in the full range $p,q>0$ involving quasi-Banach spaces. Here the borderline case would be given by $r=\alpha-\max\{0,\frac1p-1\}$.

For $1\leq p\leq\infty$, the $r$-th order $L^p$-modulus of smoothness is \begin{equation} \omega_r(u,t,\Omega)_p=\sup_{|h|\leq t}\|\Delta_h^ru\|_{L^p(\Omega_{rh})} \end{equation} where $\Omega_{rh}=\{x\in\Omega:[x+rh]\subset\Omega\}$, and $\Delta_h^r$ is the $r$-th order forward difference operator defined recursively by $[\Delta_h^1u](x)=u(x+h)-u(x)$ and $\Delta_h^ku=\Delta_h^1(\Delta_h^{k-1})u$, i.e., \begin{equation} \Delta_h^ru (x) = \sum_{k=0}^r (-1)^{r+k} \binom{r}{k} u(x+kh). \end{equation} For $1\leq p,q\leq\infty$, $\alpha\geq0$, and $r>0$ an integer, let us define $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}(\Omega)$ as the space of functions $u\in L^p(\Omega)$ for which \begin{equation} |u|_{B^\alpha_{p,q;r}(\Omega)} = \big( \int_0^\infty|t^{-\alpha}\omega_r(u,t,\Omega)_p|^q \frac{\mathrm{d}t}t \big)^{1/q} < \infty, \end{equation} with the usual modifications for $q=\infty$. If $\alpha>r$ then the space $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}$ is trivial in the sense that $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}=\mathbb{P}_{r-1}$, the polynomials of order $r$. On the other hand, so long as $r>\alpha$, different choices of $r$ will result in norms that are equivalent to each other, and in this case we have the classical Besov spaces $B^\alpha_{p,q}(\Omega)=B^\alpha_{p,q;r}(\Omega)$. The reason for this is the so-called Marchaud inequalities.

My question concerns the borderline case $r=\alpha$. In this case, the situation seems to depend on the index $q$. Can you please confirm or invalidate the followings? Reference suggestions are also very welcome.

  • If $1\leq q<\infty$ and $\alpha=r$, then $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}=\mathbb{P}_{r-1}$.
  • The case $q=\infty$ gives nontrivial spaces. Namely, we have $B^\alpha_{p,\infty;\alpha}(\Omega)=W^{\alpha,p}(\Omega)$ for $p>1$, and $B^\alpha_{1,\infty;\alpha}(\Omega)$ consists of those functions whose derivatives of order up to $\alpha-1$ are in $BV(\Omega)$.

For the one dimensional case, the second item is proved on page 53 of Constructive Approximation by DeVore and Lorentz. I have not checked but suspect that the same proof works in multi-dimensions, with $BV(\Omega)=B^1_{1,\infty;1}(\Omega)$ now taken as a definition.

Now, what puzzles me is that on page 202 of Rational approximation of real functions by Petrushev and Popov, it is claimed that $B^\alpha_{p,p;\alpha}(\Omega)$ is nontrivial, which seems to contradict the first item above.

I am also interested in the full range $p,q>0$ involving quasi-Banach spaces. Here the borderline case would be given by $r=\alpha-\max\{0,\frac1p-1\}$.

Source Link
timur
  • 3.3k
  • 1
  • 36
  • 42

Moduli of smoothness, Besov spaces, and Sobolev spaces

For $1\leq p\leq\infty$, the $r$-th order $L^p$-modulus of smoothness is \begin{equation} \omega_r(u,t,\Omega)_p=\sup_{|h|\leq t}\|\Delta_h^ru\|_{L^p(\Omega_{rh})} \end{equation} where $\Omega_{rh}=\{x\in\Omega:[x+rh]\subset\Omega\}$, and $\Delta_h^r$ is the $r$-th order forward difference operator defined recursively by $[\Delta_h^1u](x)=u(x+h)-u(x)$ and $\Delta_h^ku=\Delta_h^1(\Delta_h^{k-1})u$, i.e., \begin{equation} \Delta_h^ru (x) = \sum_{k=0}^r (-1)^{r+k} \binom{r}{k} u(x+kh). \end{equation} For $1\leq p,q\leq\infty$, $\alpha\geq0$, and $r>0$ an integer, let us define $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}(\Omega)$ as the space of functions $u\in L^p(\Omega)$ for which \begin{equation} |u|_{B^\alpha_{p,q;r}(\Omega)} = \big( \int_0^\infty|t^{-\alpha}\omega_r(u,t,\Omega)_p|^q \frac{\mathrm{d}t}t \big)^{1/q} < \infty, \end{equation} with the usual modifications for $q=\infty$. If $\alpha>r$ then the space $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}$ is trivial in the sense that $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}=\mathbb{P}_{r-1}$, the polynomials of order $r$. On the other hand, so long as $r>\alpha$, different choices of $r$ will result in norms that are equivalent to each other, and in this case we have the classical Besov spaces $B^\alpha_{p,q}(\Omega)=B^\alpha_{p,q;r}(\Omega)$. The reason for this is the so-called Marchaud inequalities.

My question concerns the borderline case $r=\alpha$. In this case, the situation seems to depend on the index $q$. Can you please confirm or invalidate the followings?

  • If $1\leq q<\infty$ and $\alpha=r$, then $B^\alpha_{p,q;r}=\mathbb{P}_{r-1}$.
  • The case $q=\infty$ gives nontrivial spaces. Namely, we have $B^\alpha_{p,\infty;\alpha}(\Omega)=W^{\alpha,p}(\Omega)$ for $p>1$, and $B^\alpha_{1,\infty;\alpha}(\Omega)$ consists of those functions whose derivatives of order up to $\alpha-1$ are in $BV(\Omega)$.

For the one dimensional case, the second item is proved on page 53 of Constructive Approximation by DeVore and Lorentz. I have not checked but suspect that the same proof works in multi-dimensions, with $BV(\Omega)=B^1_{1,\infty;1}(\Omega)$ now taken as a definition.

Now, what puzzles me is that on page 202 of Rational approximation of real functions by Petrushev and Popov, it is claimed that $B^\alpha_{p,p;\alpha}(\Omega)$ is nontrivial, which seems to contradict the first item above.

I am also interested in the full range $p,q>0$ involving quasi-Banach spaces. Here the borderline case would be given by $r=\alpha-\max\{0,\frac1p-1\}$.