Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
user9072
user9072
added 5 characters in body
Source Link
Luke
  • 69
  • 3

My qeustion is that, is there any theorem like implicit function theorem in $\mathbb{Q}$ ?

More precisely, let $p(\bar{x},\bar{y})$ be in $\mathbb{Z}[\bar{x},\bar{y}]$ such that in $\mathbb{Q}$, for any $\bar{a}$, there is a solution of $p(\bar{x},\bar{a})$. Then for some polynomial(or rational polynomial) $q(\bar{x})$$q(\bar{y})$ with $\mathbb{Q}$ coefficients, the equation $p(\bar{x},q(\bar{x}))=0$$p(q(\bar{y}),\bar{y})=0$ holds for all $\bar{x}$ in the rational polynomial fields over $\mathbb{Q}$.

For example, $x^2+y^2=1$ does not satisfy the condition but for $x+y=0$ it holds.

And how about the same question in p-adic field $\mathbb{Q}_{p}$?

My qeustion is that, is there any theorem like implicit function theorem in $\mathbb{Q}$ ?

More precisely, let $p(\bar{x},\bar{y})$ be in $\mathbb{Z}[\bar{x},\bar{y}]$ such that in $\mathbb{Q}$, for any $\bar{a}$, there is a solution of $p(\bar{x},\bar{a})$. Then for some polynomial(or rational polynomial) $q(\bar{x})$ with $\mathbb{Q}$ coefficients, the equation $p(\bar{x},q(\bar{x}))=0$ holds for all $\bar{x}$ in $\mathbb{Q}$.

For example, $x^2+y^2=1$ does not satisfy the condition but for $x+y=0$ it holds.

And how about the same question in p-adic field $\mathbb{Q}_{p}$?

My qeustion is that, is there any theorem like implicit function theorem in $\mathbb{Q}$ ?

More precisely, let $p(\bar{x},\bar{y})$ be in $\mathbb{Z}[\bar{x},\bar{y}]$ such that in $\mathbb{Q}$, for any $\bar{a}$, there is a solution of $p(\bar{x},\bar{a})$. Then for some polynomial(or rational polynomial) $q(\bar{y})$ with $\mathbb{Q}$ coefficients, $p(q(\bar{y}),\bar{y})=0$ holds in the rational polynomial fields over $\mathbb{Q}$.

For example, $x^2+y^2=1$ does not satisfy the condition but for $x+y=0$ it holds.

And how about the same question in p-adic field $\mathbb{Q}_{p}$?

deleted 6 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Luke
  • 69
  • 3

Is there any theorem like implicit function theorem in $\mathcal$\mathbb{Q}$ ?

My qeustion is that, is there any theorem like implicit function theorem in $\mathcal{Q}$$\mathbb{Q}$ ?

More precisely, let $p(\bar{x},\bar{y})$ be in $\mathcal{Z}[\bar{x},\bar{y}]$$\mathbb{Z}[\bar{x},\bar{y}]$ such that in $\mathcal{Q}$$\mathbb{Q}$, for any $\bar{a}$, there is a solution of $p(\bar{x},\bar{a})$. Then for some polynomial(or rational polynomial) $q(\bar{x})$ with $\mathcal{Q}$$\mathbb{Q}$ coefficients, the equation $p(\bar{x},q(\bar{x}))=0$ holds for all $\bar{x}$ in $\mathcal{Q}$$\mathbb{Q}$.

For example, $x^2+y^2=1$ does not satisfy the condition but for $x+y=0$ it holds.

And how about the same question in p-adic field $\mathcal{Q}_{p}$$\mathbb{Q}_{p}$?

Is there any theorem like implicit function theorem in $\mathcal{Q}$ ?

My qeustion is that, is there any theorem like implicit function theorem in $\mathcal{Q}$ ?

More precisely, let $p(\bar{x},\bar{y})$ be in $\mathcal{Z}[\bar{x},\bar{y}]$ such that in $\mathcal{Q}$, for any $\bar{a}$, there is a solution of $p(\bar{x},\bar{a})$. Then for some polynomial(or rational polynomial) $q(\bar{x})$ with $\mathcal{Q}$ coefficients, the equation $p(\bar{x},q(\bar{x}))=0$ holds for all $\bar{x}$ in $\mathcal{Q}$.

For example, $x^2+y^2=1$ does not satisfy the condition but for $x+y=0$ it holds.

And how about the same question in p-adic field $\mathcal{Q}_{p}$?

Is there any theorem like implicit function theorem in $\mathbb{Q}$ ?

My qeustion is that, is there any theorem like implicit function theorem in $\mathbb{Q}$ ?

More precisely, let $p(\bar{x},\bar{y})$ be in $\mathbb{Z}[\bar{x},\bar{y}]$ such that in $\mathbb{Q}$, for any $\bar{a}$, there is a solution of $p(\bar{x},\bar{a})$. Then for some polynomial(or rational polynomial) $q(\bar{x})$ with $\mathbb{Q}$ coefficients, the equation $p(\bar{x},q(\bar{x}))=0$ holds for all $\bar{x}$ in $\mathbb{Q}$.

For example, $x^2+y^2=1$ does not satisfy the condition but for $x+y=0$ it holds.

And how about the same question in p-adic field $\mathbb{Q}_{p}$?

added 70 characters in body
Source Link
Luke
  • 69
  • 3
Loading
Source Link
Luke
  • 69
  • 3
Loading