I am afraid answer is trivial for large N and equal just to 2. The same argument is in How many k-nomials of deg N divisible by X^16+x^12+x^5 +1 ? (Spectrum of CRC-16-CCITT erroc-correcting code ?)
- one can find binom x^l-1 divisible by all polynoms v_i. That would mean answer is TWO.
Mathematical formulation Fix some vectors $v_1, v_2 \in F_2^k$ , take some number N>k and consider circulant NxN matrices $C(v_1), C(v_2) $ which are defined by these vectors polynoms g1(put zeros on diagonals which are further then k-th diagonalx).
Consider the map "encoder" $F_2^N \to F_2^N \oplus F_2^N$, given by $x \mapsto (C(v_1) x, C(v_2) x) $.
Find some vector $y\ne 0$ in image of "encoder" with minimal Hamming weight, denote this weight by $dMin(N)$ g2(x) over F_2[x].
Question: How does $dMin(N)$ behave depending on N?
Comments Of course, everything depends on $v_i$, this makesto find minimum over polynoms p(x) of the question vague, so I am interested was it known about it for different $v_i$.:
I can take several vectorsHammingWeight(p(x) g1(x) ) + HammingWeight(p(x) g2(x) ) $v_i$ not just two.?
By HammingWeight of polynom I am not sure my descriptionmean number of C(v) is clearnon-zero monoms, let me give another. Think of vector $v\in F_k$ as a polynom of degree $k-1$ in a obvious way. Consider the operator of multiplication on this polynom acting in a factor space $F_2[x]/(x^N-1)$ - this is exactly C(v).denote by || *||
Numerical experimentTrivial estimate: minimum <= || g1(x)|| + || g2(x)||.
I took three vectors corresponding to binary form of octal numbers
G4 = 133; % 1+D^2+D^3+D^5+D^6
G7 = 171; % 1+D+D^2+D^3+D^6
G5 = 165; %165 %
Proof just put p(this is some practically used error-correcting codex) =1.
And calculated minDistance for N=10Numerical observation:24 apparently there are polynoms g1, hereg2 where this estimate is the answer:exact. Can this be true ?
Modified question 1 If I put restriction deg(E.g. 9 9 10 10 12 12 13 13 12 13 15 15 15 15 15p(x)) < N with N>> deg(gi) will it change minimum ? if yes what can be said about it ?
Modified question 2 If I am using MatLab build-in functions so for conv.codes there is certain chanceput restriction deg(p(x)) < N and moreover my math. interpretation does not fully correspond to them, but hopewill consider multiplication in the factor F_2[x]/ (x^N-1) will it is Okay.change minimum ? if yes what can be said about it ?
Error-correcting codes formulation The question is how theto calculate minimal distance of the "tail-bited" non-recursive convolutional code behave depending on block lenght N ?
Reminder Non-recursive convolutional codes If I put restriction deg(p) < N this corresponds to semi-infinite Toeplitz matricesvarious truncations of them. "Tail-biting" is cuting this semi In particular working with F_2[x]/ (x^N-infinte matrix1) corresponds to NxN circulant matrix"tail-biting".
Pay attention this is NOT kind of code considered in here:
Some related question:
What is matrix A such that Hamming weight of [x, Ax] is maximal ? (Min distance of 1/2 block code?) PS
But not I fix the classThis is completely rewritten version of codes to be convolutionalthe previous question.