Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

tags and minor format
Source Link
user9072
user9072

For a vector $w$, let $T_{w}$ be the translation by $w$.

I was told that the following observation about subsets of the plane was due to H. Hopf:

Let $X$ be a compact, path-connected subset of the plane. Then, if for some vector $v$, $X\cap T_{v}[X]\neq \emptyset$, then for each positive natural number $n$, $X\cap T_{\frac{1}{n} \cdot v} \neq \emptyset$.

I have a proof (which may or may not be Hopf's), but what I want is the reference to cite.

My understanding is that Hopf used is to prove that if a 1-sphere properly embedded on the torus represents the homology element $al+bm$ (where $l$ and $m$ are the longitude and meridian) then $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime.

Thanks in advance

Andrew Clifford

For a vector $w$, let $T_{w}$ be the translation by $w$.

I was told that the following observation about subsets of the plane was due to H. Hopf:

Let $X$ be a compact, path-connected subset of the plane. Then, if for some vector $v$, $X\cap T_{v}[X]\neq \emptyset$, then for each positive natural number $n$, $X\cap T_{\frac{1}{n} \cdot v} \neq \emptyset$.

I have a proof (which may or may not be Hopf's), but what I want is the reference to cite.

My understanding is that Hopf used is to prove that if a 1-sphere properly embedded on the torus represents the homology element $al+bm$ (where $l$ and $m$ are the longitude and meridian) then $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime.

Thanks in advance

Andrew Clifford

For a vector $w$, let $T_{w}$ be the translation by $w$.

I was told that the following observation about subsets of the plane was due to H. Hopf:

Let $X$ be a compact, path-connected subset of the plane. Then, if for some vector $v$, $X\cap T_{v}[X]\neq \emptyset$, then for each positive natural number $n$, $X\cap T_{\frac{1}{n} \cdot v} \neq \emptyset$.

I have a proof (which may or may not be Hopf's), but what I want is the reference to cite.

My understanding is that Hopf used is to prove that if a 1-sphere properly embedded on the torus represents the homology element $al+bm$ (where $l$ and $m$ are the longitude and meridian) then $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime.

Removed misaligned "vec" arrows
Source Link
Vidit Nanda
Vidit Nanda
  • 15.5k
  • 2
  • 63
  • 125

For a vector $\vec w$$w$, let $T_{\vec w}$$T_{w}$ be the translation throughby $\vec w$$w$.

I was told that the following observation about subsets of the plane was due to H. Hopf:

Let $X$ be a compact, path-connected subset of the plane. Then, if for some vector $\vec v$$v$, $X\cap T_{\vec v}[X]\neq \emptyset$$X\cap T_{v}[X]\neq \emptyset$, then for each positive natural number $n$, $X\cap T_{\frac{1}{n} \vec v}\neq \emptyset$$X\cap T_{\frac{1}{n} \cdot v} \neq \emptyset$.

I have a proof (which may or may not be Hopf's), but what I want is the reference to cite.

My understanding is that Hopf used is to prove that if a 1-sphere properly embedded on the torus represents the homology element $al+bm$ (where $l$ and $m$ are the longitude and meridian) then $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime.

Thanks in advance

Andrew Clifford

For a vector $\vec w$, let $T_{\vec w}$ be the translation through $\vec w$.

I was told that the following observation about subsets of the plane was due to H. Hopf:

Let $X$ be a compact, path-connected subset of the plane. Then, if for some vector $\vec v$, $X\cap T_{\vec v}[X]\neq \emptyset$, then for each positive natural number $n$, $X\cap T_{\frac{1}{n} \vec v}\neq \emptyset$.

I have a proof (which may or may not be Hopf's), but what I want is the reference to cite.

My understanding is that Hopf used is to prove that if a 1-sphere properly embedded on the torus represents the homology element $al+bm$ (where $l$ and $m$ are the longitude and meridian) then $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime.

Thanks in advance

Andrew Clifford

For a vector $w$, let $T_{w}$ be the translation by $w$.

I was told that the following observation about subsets of the plane was due to H. Hopf:

Let $X$ be a compact, path-connected subset of the plane. Then, if for some vector $v$, $X\cap T_{v}[X]\neq \emptyset$, then for each positive natural number $n$, $X\cap T_{\frac{1}{n} \cdot v} \neq \emptyset$.

I have a proof (which may or may not be Hopf's), but what I want is the reference to cite.

My understanding is that Hopf used is to prove that if a 1-sphere properly embedded on the torus represents the homology element $al+bm$ (where $l$ and $m$ are the longitude and meridian) then $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime.

Thanks in advance

Andrew Clifford

Source Link
Andrew Clifford
Andrew Clifford
  • 101
  • 5

Hopf reference sought

For a vector $\vec w$, let $T_{\vec w}$ be the translation through $\vec w$.

I was told that the following observation about subsets of the plane was due to H. Hopf:

Let $X$ be a compact, path-connected subset of the plane. Then, if for some vector $\vec v$, $X\cap T_{\vec v}[X]\neq \emptyset$, then for each positive natural number $n$, $X\cap T_{\frac{1}{n} \vec v}\neq \emptyset$.

I have a proof (which may or may not be Hopf's), but what I want is the reference to cite.

My understanding is that Hopf used is to prove that if a 1-sphere properly embedded on the torus represents the homology element $al+bm$ (where $l$ and $m$ are the longitude and meridian) then $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime.

Thanks in advance

Andrew Clifford