Skip to main content
Vik78's user avatar
Vik78's user avatar
Vik78's user avatar
Vik78
  • Member for 8 years, 7 months
  • Last seen this week
comment
awarded
comment
Unramified extension over $ \mathbb{Q}_{p} $
From Hensel’s lemma there’s a primitive 8th root of unity in $K$ if there’s one in the residue field of $K$
comment
Unramified extension over $ \mathbb{Q}_{p} $
The isomorphism between Galois groups of the field extension and the residue field extension is canonical, so there’s a canonical generator corresponding to frobenius
comment
What is the exterior derivative intuitively?
Yes— the exterior derivative (and differential forms in general) can be justified as the result of adding “correction factors” to familiar constructions from calculus in order to make them coordinate invariant.
comment
Understanding $(\mathbb{Z}/3)^2 \times_{\mathbb{Z}/3} M$
@NoahB I don't know, but if you know how to show that I would be very interested to see it
comment
Understanding $(\mathbb{Z}/3)^2 \times_{\mathbb{Z}/3} M$
This is a guess, but I think it's a sort of "tensor". You have groups $H \subseteq G$ and $H$ acting on a set $X$. The object you want is the Cartesian product $G \times X$ modulo the relations $(gh, x) \sim (g, hx)$ for all $g, h, x$. The $G$–action acts on the first coordinate.
comment
Why do we consider characters to $\mathbb{C}$ and not $\mathfrak{p}$-adic or $\mathbb{R}$?
One reason may be that the structure of multiplicative groups of local fields is very explicit (it’s on wikipedia). Just looking at it , in most cases I don’t think there are many interesting continuous homomorphisms from the multiplicative group of a local field $K$ to $\mathbb{Q}_p$, especially when $p$ differs from the residue characteristic of $K$. Also, morphisms from $K^\times$ to $\mathbb{C}$ include all morphisms to $\mathbb{R}$ already.
awarded
Loading…
awarded
comment
comment
Tensor product of vector bundles
Here’s a question I am not qualified to answer. Topological vector bundles are all pullbacks of the tautological bundle on the classifying space. Can we give a geometric intepretation of the tensor product using this?
Loading…
comment
Tensor product of vector bundles
For me the intuition is just that tensor product is analogous to multiplication of functions. Note that when tensoring line bundles on a scheme, the associated divisors add, the same as they do for functions. Consider the group of fractional ideals in a Dedekind domain: the ideals are not strictly speaking numbers, but passing to some extension of the fraction field any such fixed ideal becomes principal. The fractional ideals are directly analogous to line bundles on Riemann surfaces.
awarded
Loading…
1
4 5
6
7 8