Skip to main content
Vik78's user avatar
Vik78's user avatar
Vik78's user avatar
Vik78
  • Member for 8 years, 7 months
  • Last seen this week
comment
Question on whether, "An entire function, nowhere zero, has an entire logarithm," holds for matrix-valued entire functions as well
if the determinant of the matrix is nowhere zero, then for fixed $a$ and varying $b \in \mathbb{C}$ the integral $F(b) = \int\limits_a^b A^{-1}(z)dz$ along some fixed choice of path from $a$ to $b$ is well-defined, and should be path-independent. Can we show this is a logarithm?
comment
Algebraic properties of Witt vectors $W(K^{\flat\circ})$, $K$ a characteristic 0 perfectoid field
@LaurentBerger I have not, but I will. Thank you. I have also gotten a lot of insight from your own writings on period rings
comment
Non-Noetherian (classical) algebraic geometry
Perfectoid rings are typically not Noetherian, although this is not strictly about “infinitely many indeterminates”
awarded
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
comment
Does going-down theorem hold for local homomorphism of finite flat dimension?
No, by the Auslander-Buchsbaum theorem the map $\mathbb{C}[x]_{(x)} \to \mathbb{C}[x, y]_{(x,y)}$ is a counterexample
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Does going-down theorem hold for local homomorphism of finite flat dimension?
The same counterexample I gave for your previous question ($\mathbb{Z}_p \to \mathbb{F}_p$) seems to show the answer is no
Loading…
comment
Loading…
comment
comment
The Krull dimension of the tensor product of rings
See here: stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01JO . It seems like some statement for tensor products of two rings should be possible to the effect: take the images of Spec$R_1$ and Spec $R_2$ in Spec $\mathbb{Z}$, intersect them, and take the preimages $U_1, U_2$ of this intersection in Spec of each ring. The dimension of the tensor product should be something like the sum of the dimensions of $U_1$ and $U_2$.
comment
A quick introduction to the birational classification of projective curves
For curves it’s fairly simple. You can resolve all singulairites by taking the normalization and reduce to the smooth case. Then because any birational map of smooth projective curves extends to an isomorphism, you’re classifying projective curves up to isomorphism. All spelled out here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/190127/… . Saying much more requires more sophisticated tools. Riemann-Hurwitz is kind of incidental to this
1 2
3
4 5
8