Skip to main content
amakelov's user avatar
amakelov's user avatar
amakelov's user avatar
amakelov
  • Member for 8 years, 11 months
  • Last seen this week
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
Proofs where higher dimension or cardinality actually enabled much simpler proof?
@Claus - with the Buffon noodle, we take the original problem referring to a unit-length, straight needle, and we generalize in two directions: 1) to arbitrary length, and 2) to a curved needle ("noodle"). Neither of these is formally generalizing to higher dimension or higher cardinality - we just allow the needle to be longer (so, a finer notion than cardinality is being generalized here) and, if you choose to look at it this way, we give it "one more dimension" of wiggle room. I was just wondering what your point of view on this example is - does it fit your intended criteria? :)
comment
awarded
awarded
comment
Well known matrix inequality?
just a little note: $BA^{-1}$ is not necessarily symmetric - was that the intention? If not, maybe you can replace it by something like $A^{-1/2}BA^{-1/2}$ (of course this still works fine but you need to define the log without appealing to the diagonalization)
awarded
Loading…
comment
Sylvester–Gallai theorem with circle version, plane version and curve version?
you kind of have to right? otherwise the original question is false too: e.g. if all the points are on a line
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
Polynomial mapping primes to primes
@SalvoTringali yes, I'm aware of this - though the proofs I've heard about mentioned cyclotomic polynomials. Though I guess for the case of a prime difference the cyclotomic polynomials are related to the Chebyshev polynomials? Anyway. The dream was to somehow deduce the cases of Dirichlet we need to disprove the existence of a polynomial by first assuming its (false) existence :) but I haven't been able to get any more interesting cases ;/
answered
Loading…
Loading…
awarded