Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Thank you for your suggestion. As I answered @WillieWong, requiring $u$ to be a gradient is too restrictive. A generalization of this condition is to require $\delta u = g$, that is, $\partial u / \partial x^i - \partial u/ \partial x_j = f_{ii}$, where $f_{ij} = - f_{ji}$. I could then try to study the operator $P$ augmented with the extra equations. Do you know if there in some sense in which this operator could be considered elliptic?
@WillieWong this is an interesting suggestion, but I think that it restricts too much the classes of solution that I can consider. Locally this is equivalent than considering that the rotational vanishes. The obvious generalization would be to set $δu = g$..
I also though about using the Hodge decomposition and fix the codifferential of $u$ and try to use boundary conditions to determine the harmonic part, but I do not think that this approach is possible if you allow $g$ to depend on $u$
Also, you are right that $f$ is not a top form, but a fiber bundle morphism from $E \to M$ to $\Lambda^k(M) \to M$, so $f(\cdot, u(\cdot))$ is the actual volume form. I only look for locally defined solution, so the manifold is completely irrelevant.
What is the deffinition of the Laplace-Beltrami operator? Does your manifold has some Riemannian metric? If so, does it satisfy some compatibility condition with the contact structure (e. g. is M a Sassakian manifold)?