Skip to main content
mlainz's user avatar
mlainz's user avatar
mlainz's user avatar
mlainz
  • Member for 9 years
  • Last seen this week
awarded
comment
Understanding the Lie derivative by multivector fields
This follows from $[X\wedge Y,Z] = X\wedge [Y,Z] \pm [X,Z]\wedge Y $ (see [1])
comment
Understanding the Lie derivative by multivector fields
This does not generalize to $p$-vector fields with $p>2$. One can compute that if $X = X_1 \wedge X_2 \wedge X_3$ then $[X,X] = 0$ always.
Loading…
comment
Under which conditions does this PDE have unique solutions
This might work. I will think about it.
comment
Under which conditions does this PDE have unique solutions
Thank you for your suggestion. As I answered @WillieWong, requiring $u$ to be a gradient is too restrictive. A generalization of this condition is to require $\delta u = g$, that is, $\partial u / \partial x^i - \partial u/ \partial x_j = f_{ii}$, where $f_{ij} = - f_{ji}$. I could then try to study the operator $P$ augmented with the extra equations. Do you know if there in some sense in which this operator could be considered elliptic?
comment
Under which conditions does this PDE have unique solutions
@WillieWong this is an interesting suggestion, but I think that it restricts too much the classes of solution that I can consider. Locally this is equivalent than considering that the rotational vanishes. The obvious generalization would be to set $δu = g$..
revised
Loading…
comment
Under which conditions does this PDE have unique solutions
I also though about using the Hodge decomposition and fix the codifferential of $u$ and try to use boundary conditions to determine the harmonic part, but I do not think that this approach is possible if you allow $g$ to depend on $u$
comment
Under which conditions does this PDE have unique solutions
Also, you are right that $f$ is not a top form, but a fiber bundle morphism from $E \to M$ to $\Lambda^k(M) \to M$, so $f(\cdot, u(\cdot))$ is the actual volume form. I only look for locally defined solution, so the manifold is completely irrelevant.
comment
Under which conditions does this PDE have unique solutions
@WillieWong You are right about the EDIT, I will remove it.
awarded
awarded
revised
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Contact manifolds and pseudodifferential operators
What is the deffinition of the Laplace-Beltrami operator? Does your manifold has some Riemannian metric? If so, does it satisfy some compatibility condition with the contact structure (e. g. is M a Sassakian manifold)?
comment
"Uniform probability" on a set of naturals
Is there one that has the property that the even numbers have measure 1/2? Or, more generaly, the mesasure of n $\mathbb{N}$ is $1/n$?
awarded