Skip to main content
Dmitry Vaintrob's user avatar
Dmitry Vaintrob's user avatar
Dmitry Vaintrob's user avatar
Dmitry Vaintrob
  • Member for 14 years, 5 months
  • Last seen more than 1 year ago
  • Cambridge, MA
Loading…
awarded
awarded
reviewed
Approve
comment
Monoidality of truncation of spectra
@Tyler, Thanks! I meant a reference for the [-j:0] truncations preserving symmetric monoidal structure
awarded
comment
Monoidality of truncation of spectra
@DylanWilson, sorry, I should have put up a co-trigger warning
comment
Monoidality of truncation of spectra
@TylerLawson, thanks! Do you have a reference?
comment
Connection between homotopy category and derived category
The notation $K(A)$ for the homotopy category is unusual, and there is no reasonable functor from the homotopy category to $D(A)$. By $K(A)$ do you mean the category of cofibrant objects?
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
comment
Monoidality of truncation of spectra
Did I get my arrows backwards? The map $X^i\wedge \Sigma^\infty BS_i\to X$ should canonically preserve the connective part
asked
Loading…
comment
Is the property of being a dg generator open?
Thanks! This is a great example that I should have thought of before posting. I suppose it shows that the dga $\text{End}^*_{\mathbb{P}^1}(\mathcal{O}_P)$ is a deformation of $\text{End}^*_{\mathbb{P}^1}(\mathcal{O}\oplus \mathcal{O}(-1)[1]),$ but they are not deformations in the opposite order (which is why I was curious about this)
accepted
comment
Is the property of being a dg generator open?
I am open to interpretation. But a simple working definition on an affine variety $\text{Spec}(R)$ would be a compact object in the category of objects of $\mathcal{C}$ with $R$-action.
revised
Is the property of being a dg generator open?
added 11 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Is the property of being a dg generator open?
You mean non-existence of nontrivial deformations? Thanks :)
awarded
revised
Loading…
1
13 14
15
16 17
25