Skip to main content
Thomas Poguntke's user avatar
Thomas Poguntke's user avatar
Thomas Poguntke's user avatar
Thomas Poguntke
  • Member for 9 years, 9 months
  • Last seen more than 6 years ago
awarded
comment
Characters of the kernel of the norm map of an extension of local fields
Doesn’t the short exact sequence $1 \to \widehat{F^{\times}} / \widehat G \to \widehat{E^{\times}} \to \widehat K \to 1$ imply that any character of $K$ has infinitely many extensions to $E^{\times}$?
comment
About enveloping algebras of direct sums
If by one-to-one you mean isomorphism, then yes; the Yoneda lemma holds for any category, including $\mathcal C$.
comment
About enveloping algebras of direct sums
This is the Yoneda lemma: if $\alpha^*$ is a bijective for all $A \in \mathcal C$, then $\alpha$ is an isomorphism in $\mathcal C$.
comment
About enveloping algebras of direct sums
I've specified the categories, and I hope this makes it clearer.
revised
About enveloping algebras of direct sums
added 251 characters in body
Loading…
answered
Loading…
comment
About enveloping algebras of direct sums
Yes, that is what I meant (just on the other side of the Yoneda embedding).
comment
About enveloping algebras of direct sums
Ah, sorry, I thought $\alpha$ was supposed to be an isomorphism of algebras, which only makes sense if $\mathfrak g_1$ and $\mathfrak g_2$ commute.
comment
About enveloping algebras of direct sums
If you apply $\text{Hom}(-,A)$ to your map for an $R$-algebra $A$, won't both sides be described by $(f,g) \in \text{Hom}(\mathfrak g_1,A) \times \text{Hom}(\mathfrak g_2,A)$ such that $[f(x),g(y)] = 0$ for all $x,y$?
awarded
comment
Double-categorical refinement of twisted arrow category: does it have a name?
As a bisimplicial set, it is also called the total décalage of (the nerve of) $C$.
awarded
comment
Is quotient by maximal destabilizing sheaf, torsion-free?
I don't think there is such a thing as geometrically (non-)torsion-free.
awarded
comment
comment
How do morphism of Groups be the same as the Group-Representation
This follows from Tannaka's reconstruction theorem (cf. math.stackexchange.com/q/996422), at least if $k$ is commutative.
comment
The symmetric product of a stack and its motive
This paper seems to elaborate a bit on what Ekedahl does. arxiv.org/abs/1008.5063
comment
The non-existence of the fine moduli scheme of vector bundles. Why?
More precisely, $\mathcal E$ is a vector bundle on $C \times_k M$, namely corresponding to the identity morphism $\phi = \text{id}\!: M \to M$.