Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Many thanks for your answer and your references. I was more or less convinced that both of the corollaries were already known. Nevertheless, my result works for general Dirichlet series and, as far as I know, requires less (differents) assumptions than those of the Selberg class. Of course, my conclusions are weaker. Is my result still of interest?
I actually went to the fundamental mathematics' lab at my university this afternoon. Unfortunately (or not!), it's the holidays in France and they ends in two weeks. I can not wait! But I know that a direct answer will always be preferable.
If $f$ is a cusp form, then it vanishes at all cusps. Else, $f$ is a linear combinaison of Eisenstein series : thus, can we find a certain basis for the Eisenstein-space for which one knows the constant term at each cusps of each element of the basis ?
@PeterHumphries : I heard that the Atkin-Lehner involution method was only working in the case where $f$ is a cusp form and a new form. Can you please explain me the general method ? (Thanks !)