Skip to main content
Nathan Chappell's user avatar
Nathan Chappell's user avatar
Nathan Chappell's user avatar
Nathan Chappell
  • Member for 6 months
  • Last seen more than a week ago
  • Osijek, Croatia
comment
The true reason for the incompleteness of formal systems
@provocateur I've added a section on infinite types. Let me know what you think!
revised
Loading…
comment
revised
Loading…
comment
The true reason for the incompleteness of formal systems
@provocateur Are you familiar with Curry-Howard? The idea of propositions as types comes from that. It's untypable in the simply typed lambda calculus (and some extensions that essentially introduce other "logical connectives" than ->). It's typable in other systems. I don't know about other's making the claim, I guess I didn't even consider it to be a claim and more of an observation. I'll put up an explanation a little later, although we're going to need to use $\beta$ reduction...
revised
The true reason for the incompleteness of formal systems
Additional explanation, remove superflous narrative
Loading…
comment
The true reason for the incompleteness of formal systems
@provocateur The type of the Y combinator is the diagonalization lemma, the combinator Y itself is the proof of the lemma. That's not really a claim, that's the interpretation of the Curry-Howard isomorphism... What I'm claiming is about what Goedel might have meant and showing the relationship to type theory in case it's of interest.
comment
The true reason for the incompleteness of formal systems
@provocateur I added a new section, please let me know if it needs to be further elaborated.
revised
The true reason for the incompleteness of formal systems
Clarify relationship of Y and Incompleteness
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
awarded