Skip to main content
Karl's user avatar
Karl's user avatar
Karl's user avatar
Karl
  • Member for 10 years, 6 months
  • Last seen more than 10 years ago
comment
Widely accepted mathematical results that were later shown to be wrong?
still waiting for @SeanTilson to do what he claimed. Mundheld!
comment
What are the advantages of phrasing results in terms of exact sequences and commutative diagrams?
@KConrad I guess psychologically the kernel has to be $\mathbf{Z}/(a,b)\mathbf{Z}$ and the cokernel $U(\mathbf{Z}/(a,b)\mathbf{Z})$? I agree that I should have written $1$, somehow I am used to modules, hence additive notation.
awarded
comment
What are the advantages of phrasing results in terms of exact sequences and commutative diagrams?
@KConrad: as for the "nice 4-term" sequence which you mention, is it $$0\rightarrow \ker\rightarrow U(\mathbf{Z}/ab\mathbf{Z})\rightarrow U(\mathbf{Z}/a\mathbf{Z})\times U(\mathbf{Z}/b\mathbf{Z})\rightarrow \operatorname{Coker}\rightarrow 0$$? +1 for mentioning this very nice proof