Skip to main content
AlpinistKitten's user avatar
AlpinistKitten's user avatar
AlpinistKitten's user avatar
AlpinistKitten
  • Member for 2 years, 8 months
  • Last seen this week
awarded
comment
If $f \in L^p(\Omega)$, then $f \in L^q(\Omega)$ for some $q < p + \epsilon$?
@JochenWengenroth: my most sincere apologies for asking.
comment
If $f \in L^p(\Omega)$, then $f \in L^q(\Omega)$ for some $q < p + \epsilon$?
@OlivierBégassat: the choice of $\epsilon > 0$ will depend on $f$, as in the formulation of the question. If it belongs to the Lebesgue space with exponent $p+\epsilon$, then it will belong to all Lebesgue spaces with smaller exponent.
Loading…
comment
Properties a triangulation must have in order to describe a manifold
@G.Blaickner : thank you so much. The equivalence to the Poincare conjecture is honestly quite shocking since many people will intuitively take "combinatorial" for granted.
comment
Properties a triangulation must have in order to describe a manifold
Could you please provide a few references for the claims in your first paragraph?
comment
Loading…
awarded
comment
Motivation and physical interpretation of the Laplace transform
It's nice that you mention projections onto a one-parameter family of functions. That's how you can motivate the Fourier transform.
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
Loading…