Skip to main content
Angelo's user avatar
Angelo's user avatar
Angelo's user avatar
Angelo
  • Member for 14 years, 9 months
  • Last seen this week
awarded
awarded
comment
Diagonal morphism of henselization is an open immersion?
Yes, of course I knew that. I can't believe that I said something this moronic. I had an idea in mind which goes beyond the stupidity of what I wrote; if I can make it work I'll post it, hoping not to embarrass myself again :-)
comment
Diagonal morphism of henselization is an open immersion?
If $I$ is the kernel of the map $R^h \otimes_R R^h \rightarrow R^h$, then $I/I^2$ is the module of differentials of $R^h/R$, which is $0$. Hence if $I$ is not $0$, it can not be finitely generated. But it seems clear that $(x + 1)^{1/2} \otimes 1 - 1 \otimes (x + 1)^{1/2}$ is not $0$.
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
Gerbes over finite fields
If the gerbe is étale, then the fact that the cohomological dimension of the Galois group is 1 does imply that it is neutralizable (see for example the proof of Lemma 4.4) in my paper with Giulio Bresciani "Fields of moduli and the arithmetic of tame quotient singularities". In the general case I am not sure how to proceed.
comment
Gerbes over finite fields
This is a nice argument!
comment
Gerbes over finite fields
In case the gerbe has affine diagonal this is Theorem 8.1 in Di Proietto, Tonini and Zhang, Frobenius fixed objects of moduli. Actually, they show this for general fpqc gerbes, without finiteness hypotheses.
comment
Extending étale covers from the regular locus to a resolution of singularities
This is false in many cases, even with extremely mild singularities; for example, the fundamental group of the cone over a smooth conic in P^2 with the vertex removed is cyclic of order 2, while a resolution of singularities is simply connected.
awarded
comment
Topology of Lefschetz pencil
$X$ is homotopy equivalent to $X_0$. See for example mathoverflow.net/questions/264940/…
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
Terminological question on finite groups
Thanks a lot. So, it appears that the is no standard name; but the paper by Lucchini, Menegazzo and Morigi is very interesting.
1
2 3 4 5
56