Skip to main content
Roberto Pignatelli's user avatar
Roberto Pignatelli's user avatar
Roberto Pignatelli's user avatar
Roberto Pignatelli
  • Member for 10 years, 10 months
  • Last seen more than 1 year ago
Loading…
awarded
answered
Loading…
comment
Explicit defining equations for del Pezzo surfaces
Equations for the degree 5 case are in arxiv.org/abs/1812.10715. Equations in a product of lines are in arxiv.org/abs/1803.02984 section 3
awarded
comment
Étale homotopy equivalent varieties are deformation equivalent
This is my point. After the work of Manetti and Catanese and others we have simply connected topological manifolds with two complex structures that are not deformation equivalent. I would expect that their examples may be adapted to characteristic p to give a negative answer to your question, but I'm not an expert in finite characteristic issues.
comment
comment
Subsheaves of constant sheaves
I think I misread your question. I interpreted locally constant as locally trivial, I mean invertible. Sorry
answered
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Deformations of a blow up
deleted 36 characters in body
Loading…
awarded
asked
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
awarded
revised
equations for a bidouble cover
deleted 9 characters in body
Loading…
comment
equations for a bidouble cover
I'm not sure what you mean by $Y$, but I think here you are wrong, this factorization is biregular. A bidouble cover $X \rightarrow Z$ can be factored as a composition of two double covers in three different way, say $X \rightarrow Y_i \rightarrow Z$: if $L_1,L_2,L_3,D_1,D_2,D_3$ are the building data of $X \rightarrow Z$, then $f_i \colon Y_i \rightarrow Z$ is the double cover branched on $D_j+D_k$ (here $\{i,j,k\}=\{1,2,3\}$) whereas the double cover $X \rightarrow Y_i$ is branched on the pull-back of $D_i$.
answered
Loading…
answered
Loading…
1
2 3 4 5