Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
And sorry if this is naive, I'm also having trouble proving point 1 rigorously, clearly we have the commutative diagram $$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} Y @>{i}>> X;\\ @V{q_2}VV@VV{q_1} V\\ Y/\sim @>{f}>>X/\sim \end{CD},$$ where $i$ is inclusion, $q_1,q_2$ are quotient maps, and $f$ is the induced map, it is easy to prove f is bijective and continuous, but I failed to prove it is a homeomorphism. If I can prove $q_1\circ i$ is a quotient map , then it should be done, but my point-set topology failed me.
Hi Marco, I just tried to follow your argument in detail, and I had difficulty verifying the claim $Y/\sim\cong (U(2)/D)\times U(2)$. For $Y/\sim$ we are identifying $(A,B)\sim(A\Lambda, B\Lambda)$ where $\Lambda$ is any 2 by 2 diagonal unitray matrix, while it seems for $(U(2)/D)\times U(2)$ we are identifying $(A,B)\sim(A\Lambda, B)$, how do I see there is a homeomorphism between them? Is there an explicit construction?
@MarcoGolla: This looks like a promising simplification, but I just started peeking into some general homotopy theory so I'm not able to tell if an answer is immediate using this simplification, would you care to elaborate?