Skip to main content
Ali Taghavi's user avatar
Ali Taghavi's user avatar
Ali Taghavi's user avatar
Ali Taghavi
  • Member for 11 years, 5 months
  • Last seen this week
revised
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
comment
How much information can we extract about such a group?
what about if we replace arbitrary $r$ with $r=lcm (m,n)$? namely for every $m,n$ there are elements $g,h$ with $|g|=m,\quad |h|=n,\quad |gh|=\frac{mn}{gcd(m,n)}$?
comment
How much information can we extract about such a group?
@GilesGardam What about a possible "simple" example: a simple group with the property under discussion?The example you mentioned is a direct product of all possible finite group mentioned in theorem 1.64(for all m,n, r) but it is not a simple group. So is there a simple example and then classification of all simple example would be the next question
comment
Is the Poincare Birkhoff theorem valid if we change the volume form of the annulus region?
@DanielAsimov BTW may I ask you to look at the updated question (a relation to Arnold conjecture)?
comment
revised
Loading…
comment
Is the Poincare Birkhoff theorem valid if we change the volume form of the annulus region?
@DanielAsimov The tragedy is that the Poincare Birkhoff is about topological $[0 1]\times S^1$ but it is not about product metric
revised
Loading…
revised
Nonequivalent definitions in Mathematics
deleted 16 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Is the Poincare Birkhoff theorem valid if we change the volume form of the annulus region?
@DanielAsimov What is a reference for the Moser theorem you mentioned?
comment
Alexandrov-Fenchel theorem for Riemannian manifolds
@DanielAsimov Perhaps one possible sense could be the following: We change the metric on $\mathbb{R}^n$ and compute the volum wrt the new metric. The convexity can have two interpretation: wrt the straight lines or wrt the geodesics of metrics. Is it a reasonable sense for consideration of the generalized Fenchel theorem?
comment
Is the Poincare Birkhoff theorem valid if we change the volume form of the annulus region?
So if the multiplication version of the theorem is true we can not conclude that the Poincare Birkhoff theorem is true for arbitrary volum form. Am I mistaken?
comment
Is the Poincare Birkhoff theorem valid if we change the volume form of the annulus region?
@DanielAsimov I correct a typos: $\int_M f^* \alpha =\int_M \alpha$
comment
Is the Poincare Birkhoff theorem valid if we change the volume form of the annulus region?
@DanielAsimov Is it realy the case? if it would be true so one may associate an intrinsic volum to every manifold M: the integral of arbitrary volum form over M. By theorem of change of variabble $\int_M f^* \alpha =\int M \alpha$. But I guess the theorem of Moser has a function multiplication too that is $\alpha =g f^* \beta$ for a positive function $g$. Do you agree?
Loading…
comment
Rotation number for homeomorphisms of a Lie group other than $S^1$
@MartinM.W. Thank you! could you please give me a reference. I googled "Rotation set" and Lie group simultaneously but I could not find materials in this regard
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
1
22 23
24
25 26
391