Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
@LSpice: we are assuming that $R^\times=\{1,u,\ldots,u^4\}$, so we must have $-u=u^i$ for some $i$. Since $u$ is a unit, this means that $-1=u^{i-1}$ for some $i$. But $-1$ has order dividing $2$, and we are in a cyclic group of order $5$, so $-1$ must have order $1$, i.e. be equal to $1$. I guess, I could have bypassed the whole $-u$ business. Let me edit.
There is no "best result in that direction", since you have too few hypotheses. For example if $K/\mathbb{Q}$ is finite and the representation is over a field of characteristic $0$, then everything is diagonalisable, but that has nothing to do with Galois representations. In general, (Weil-Deligne) representations for which Frobenii are diagonalisable are called "Frobenius semisimple". You can google that term for lots of literature, but almost none of it will be "elementary".
You have almost no hypotheses, so the answer is clearly no. Just take $K/\mathbb{Q}$ to be finite Galois, e.g. with Galois group $S_3$, and take $\rho$ to be irreducible over a finite field such that some element of $S_3$ is sent to a non-diagonalisable matrix. For $S_3$, the standard representation arising from the isomorphism $S_3\cong {\rm GL}_2(\mathbb{F}_2)$ will do, where the involutions are not diagonalisable. By Chebotarev, every element of your Galois group will be a Frobenius at some $p$.
More generally (and basically for the same reason), if $L/K$ is Galois and $\mathfrak{m}$ is a Galois stable modulus of $L$, then the ray class field of $L$ with modulus $\mathfrak{m}$ is Galois over $K$.