"It needs to be iterated once again" because most people who ask questions about Goldbach are not aware of Vinogradov's work. The second point I was trying to make is that I am of the impression that while very nice and striking, this work, will not have repercussions for analytic number theorists unconcerned with explicit estimates (something people unaware of the first point typically ignore). I would be surprised if Harald disagreed (in good faith) with me.