Skip to main content
MWB's user avatar
MWB's user avatar
MWB's user avatar
MWB
  • Member for 11 years, 11 months
  • Last seen more than a month ago
  • California, USA
awarded
Loading…
awarded
awarded
Loading…
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
What makes dependent type theory more suitable than set theory for proof assistants?
@KevinBuzzard Even if I had proved 2 > 0 on the previous line, I had to prove it again on this line -- Maybe this part of Lean should have been fixed instead? I know nothing about proof assistants, but this sounds totally unreasonable.
comment
What makes dependent type theory more suitable than set theory for proof assistants?
giving 0/0 a concrete value Does this apply to Lean though?
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
What makes dependent type theory more suitable than set theory for proof assistants?
@none That example is not very good IMHO. Those existentially quantified variables could simply be replaced by Skolem functions of the variables that they actually depend on.
awarded
awarded
comment
What makes dependent type theory more suitable than set theory for proof assistants?
What is Lean's F? (And does it change between versions?)