Skip to main content
Philippe Gaucher's user avatar
Philippe Gaucher's user avatar
Philippe Gaucher's user avatar
Philippe Gaucher
  • Member for 12 years, 6 months
  • Last seen this week
revised
Are cofibrant objects flat with respect to Day convolution?
Two ArXiv urls replaced by hyperlink towards published online version
Loading…
comment
Reedy cofibration category structure
@PeterLeFanuLumsdaine Indeed, it's Theorem 9.2.4 of Cofibrations in Homotopy Theory.
Loading…
comment
Situation with Artemov's paper?
I have a very naive question. Intuitively, this means that you put the "for all n" outside the statement defining consistency. So the serial property $Con^S(PA)$ has no Gödel numbering. Is it correct ?
Loading…
awarded
comment
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
Loading…
revised
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Explicit CW-complex replacement of the space of reparametrization maps
@DenisT 'Obvious' like 'nice' means nothing. I like your idea and I will take it as an answer since it works also by replacing the nondecreasing surjective maps by the nondecreasing homeomorphisms.
Loading…
comment
Homotopy theory for small strict semimonoidal topologically enriched categories
@SimonHenry The problem I see with the two approaches is that all objects would be cofibrant. And what I think is that, as a reparametrization category, the terminal category should not be cofibrant.
1
2 3 4 5
33