Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
I have a very naive question. Intuitively, this means that you put the "for all n" outside the statement defining consistency. So the serial property $Con^S(PA)$ has no Gödel numbering. Is it correct ?
@DenisT 'Obvious' like 'nice' means nothing. I like your idea and I will take it as an answer since it works also by replacing the nondecreasing surjective maps by the nondecreasing homeomorphisms.
@SimonHenry The problem I see with the two approaches is that all objects would be cofibrant. And what I think is that, as a reparametrization category, the terminal category should not be cofibrant.