Skip to main content
laerne's user avatar
laerne's user avatar
laerne's user avatar
laerne
Unregistered
  • Member for 12 years, 9 months
awarded
comment
Simple Equivariant homology [no borel-Moore]
Yeah, I've already found it. But I'm rather asking "what is equivariant homology ?".
comment
Simple Equivariant homology [no borel-Moore]
Huuu... This is not encouraging, especially since I don't know what a Mackey functor and most of those concepts are...
asked
Loading…
awarded
accepted
comment
equivalence of definitions of Carmichael numbers
So you add a constraint ($a \equiv 1 (n/p^k)$) to find an element. Quite clever, I didn't see that one. Thank you very much !
comment
equivalence of definitions of Carmichael numbers
Thank you very, I begin to see the pattern of the proof. Though I do not need Korselt Criterion, I shall prove it on the run, so it's done. But one big problem remains for me : why do $(a,n)=1$ ? for instance if $n$ would be $p^k(1+p^{k-1})$, the statement would be wrong since $a|n$. Of course such a $n$ is not a caermichael number for $k \ge 2$ since it is not square-free, but that's what I want to prove ! Finding coprimes is a recurring issue I cannot get rid of. PS: Sorry for the answer, I use another account to answer. I didn't understand you can recover an account.
awarded
revised
Loading…
Loading…