Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
@LiviuNicolaescu, Thanks for the reference, too! That made everything very clear. It's also a very nicely written book. If you want to put this into an answer, I would approve it.
That's a fair question. The integral is just a real number. For the second part of your comment: maybe it all comes down to whether you can pull back a section of a differential pseudo-form. I don't know if it's possible either...
The integral of a section of $\Psi$ (as far as I know) is only defined over $M$, or over subset of $M$. In this case, the intergral is a real number. That is an interesting point about restricting $\Psi$ to the boundary. But, does the restriction of the pseudoscalar bundle to the boundary canonically give the pseudoscalar bundle of the boundary? If not, I don't see how you can integrate a $(n-1)$-form on $\partial M$ and get a real number answer.