Skip to main content
Dirk Werner's user avatar
Dirk Werner's user avatar
Dirk Werner's user avatar
Dirk Werner
  • Member for 6 years, 4 months
  • Last seen this week
  • Berlin
awarded
Loading…
comment
Reference for Density question
An explicit reference is Lemma 1.2.19 in T. Hytönen, J. van Neerven, M. Veraar, L. Weis, Analysis in Banach Spaces, Vol. 1 (Springer 2016). Neither reflexivity nor separability matter here.
answered
Loading…
comment
Strong sub-differentiability of an equivalent strictly convex norm
I haven't quite caught where the confusion arises. (The set NA$(X)$ depends of course on the norm on $X$ chosen.) And who are the authors of the book you are quoting?
revised
Loading…
comment
Proof of the Dunford-Pettis theorem in the context of probability spaces
Well, this does complete the proof since the metrisability of weakly compact sets in separable spaces is a well-known fact (showing the easy half of Eberlein-Shmulyan).
comment
Proof of the Dunford-Pettis theorem in the context of probability spaces
One needs the additional information that weakly compact sets in separable Banach spaces (like the closed linear span of the $X_n$) are metrisable; therefore one actually can extract a weakly convergent subsequence.
awarded
Loading…
answered
Loading…
comment
Does there exist a non-zero signed finite borel measure which is zero on all balls?
Wouldn't the support of a (regular finite) measure be separable?
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
suggested
Approve
reviewed
Looks OK
reviewed
Looks OK
reviewed
Looks OK
1
2 3 4 5
29