Skip to main content
Reid Barton's user avatar
Reid Barton's user avatar
Reid Barton's user avatar
Reid Barton
  • Member for 15 years, 2 months
  • Last seen more than a month ago
awarded
awarded
awarded
Loading…
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
Non-invertible map between principal bundles only locally trivial in a supercanonical Grothendieck topology?
In my example $f$ is a principal bundle because it becomes trivial (an isomorphism) after pulling back along a cover, namely $f$ itself.
comment
Non-invertible map between principal bundles only locally trivial in a supercanonical Grothendieck topology?
Are you interested in "real" examples, or contrived ones? e.g. if $f : A \to B$ is any noninvertible mono that we declare to be a singleton covering family, then $f$ is also a map of principal bundles on $B$ for the trivial group that does not have an inverse. (But after sheafififcation, it will have an inverse.)
awarded
comment
Book that shows a construction of ZFC with Calculus of Constructions
It's not exactly what you asked for for several reasons, but the HoTT book does start from basic type theory, and constructs a universe of ZF-style sets in section 10.5.
comment
Homotopy fibers in the Joyal model structure and the Kan–Quillen model structure
What about $C = \partial \Delta^1$, $D = \Delta^1$, $p$ the inclusion. Do I understand your question right?
awarded
comment
Is the singular simplicial complex functor $\operatorname{Sing}_\bullet:\operatorname{Top} \to \operatorname{sSets}$ fully faithful for nice spaces?
What I meant is that, for fixed X, your equation holds for all Y if and only if the counit |Sing X| -> X is a homeomorphism. And both |Sing X| and (by assumption) X are "nice" spaces, so if (as usual) they are different, we should be able to see the difference using maps into another "nice" space Y.
awarded
Loading…
1
2 3 4 5
56