Skip to main content
M.Lopes's user avatar
M.Lopes's user avatar
M.Lopes's user avatar
M.Lopes
  • Member for 7 years, 10 months
  • Last seen more than 7 years ago
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
accepted
comment
Where to publish a new proof of an old theorem?
Thank you, Karl Schwede. I won't write anything related, because my research field is very far from this. I just came up with this demonstration while "playing" with some different problems on a Sunday. :)
comment
Where to publish a new proof of an old theorem?
Thank you, Alexandre Eremenko. No, it doesn't give any new insight, that's why I wondered in the first place if it was worth publishing it. Then, I thought: why not? It's still interesting at least as a curiosity.
comment
Where to publish a new proof of an old theorem?
thank you! I'll submit to the American Mathematical Monthly as you suggest, and let's see how it goes. (The theorem is very common, and I won't certainly write any book on the subject.)
comment
Where to publish a new proof of an old theorem?
@StefanKohl, I don't want to go into many details, otherwise you'd prove it yourself. :)
comment
Where to publish a new proof of an old theorem?
@WłodzimierzHolsztyński, unfortunately my time machine has not been working lately.
comment
Where to publish a new proof of an old theorem?
@AnthonyQuas, no, no advantages whatsoever. It's just interesting because it is more simple and quick than the standard demonstration, although it relies on more advanced math.
comment
Where to publish a new proof of an old theorem?
@NoahSchweber, thank you for your suggestion. I think I will consider that option after a few more attempts.
awarded
awarded
awarded
Loading…