Skip to main content
Ramin's user avatar
Ramin's user avatar
Ramin's user avatar
Ramin
  • Member for 14 years, 1 month
  • Last seen this week
comment
Bounds for the orders of second largest subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb F_q)$
@DerekHolt Your book is beautifully written! Thank you for recommending it!
comment
Bounds for the orders of second largest subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb F_q)$
@DerekHolt The class $\mathcal C_G$ for $G = SL_n(\mathbb F_q)$ is very explicit in Aschbacher's paper, but it's not clear to me what Aschbacher's main theorem actually says about subgroups that are not in $\mathcal C_G$, so perhaps the description is in Kleidman and Liebeck as Peter Mueller suggested.
comment
Bounds for the orders of second largest subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb F_q)$
@DerekHolt That's also my intuition, but do you know how one might prove it without going through Aschbacher's theorem?
Loading…
awarded
awarded
comment
Smallest permutation representation of a finite group?
Cooperstein's paper doesn't assume faithful.
awarded
awarded
awarded
revised
Loading…
asked
Loading…
awarded
asked
Loading…
comment
Reference request: Tate's conjecture for L functions of motives
Thank you, @DamianRössler. Scheider's paper is from 30 years ago. I was wondering if there are any more recent articles (post Voevodsky's works).
Loading…
accepted
comment
Wonderful compactification
@FriedrichKnop Friedrich and Jason, thank you both for comments. Friedrich, what is a reference for the statement about the closure of P?
comment
Wonderful compactification
@JasonStarr: that's certainly true. At any rate, the issue is not the reductive part as the closure of M in X is Y. It is not clear to me what the closure of U is. One might be tempted to say that it is isomorphic to G/P, but that's not true--as this guy is not bi-equivariant for U.
1
2 3 4 5 6