Skip to main content
33 votes
Accepted

Why is Voevodsky's motivic homotopy theory 'the right' approach?

(Don't be afraid about the word "$\infty$-category" here: they're just a convenient framework to do homotopy theory in). I'm going to try with a very naive answer, although I'm not sure I understand ...
Denis Nardin's user avatar
  • 16.5k
25 votes

Why is the motivic category defined over the site of smooth schemes only?

It's worth noting first that smooth schemes are essentially the smallest possible category from which one can define the motivic homotopy category: to make sense of $\mathbb A^1$-homotopy and of the ...
Marc Hoyois's user avatar
  • 8,972
21 votes

Why is Voevodsky's motivic homotopy theory 'the right' approach?

I just want to point out, with regards to your second question, that the fact that the $\mathbb P^1$ is not equivalent to a simplicial complex homotopic to the sphere built out of affine spaces (or ...
Will Sawin's user avatar
  • 148k
19 votes

$\zeta(-n)=2^{r_1}\frac{|K_{2n}(O)|}{|K_{2n+1}(O)|} R_K$ and replace $K$-theory with $\mathbb{S}$

Yes, you can do a lot of what you ask about in your question, and if you're willing to change the questions slightly, you can do even more. I have thought a lot about these kinds of questions. I'm ...
user509184's user avatar
  • 1,335
18 votes
Accepted

What's motivic about $\mathbb{A}^1$-homotopy theory? What's motivic about correspondences?

There is no need a priori to define these categories of motives starting from correspondences. The stable homotopy theory of schemes $SH$ may be characterized by a universal property saying that it is ...
D.-C. Cisinski's user avatar
17 votes

Why is the motivic category defined over the site of smooth schemes only?

It makes sense to consider larger versions of the (unstable and stable) motivic homotopy categories built out of the site $Sch_S$ of all schemes over $S$ (say of finite type to avoid dealing with size ...
AAK's user avatar
  • 5,901
16 votes

Is there a geometric realization of $\mathbf{C}((t))$-varieties?

I know nothing about $\mathbf{A}^1$-homotopy. I will describe how one can get a functor from smooth varieties over $\mathbf{C}((t))$ to ${\rm Top}_{/\mathbf{S}^1}$ using log smooth proper models and ...
Piotr Achinger's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

Which motivic spectra are dualizable?

If $X$ is noetherian of dimension $>0$, there is always a compact object of $SH(X)$ which is not dualizable: e.g. $j_\sharp$ of the sphere spectrum where $j:U\to X$ is any dense open immersion with ...
D.-C. Cisinski's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

Who proved the motivic 6-functor formalism?

My understanding is that Scholze was citing Gallauer for the universal property of the 6FF of motivic spectra (an unpublished result as far as I know), not for the existence of the 6FF. This result ...
Marc Hoyois's user avatar
  • 8,972
14 votes
Accepted

Is algebraic $K$-theory a motivic spectrum?

Let me assume that $S$ is a regular Noetherian scheme (for example a field). Then algebraic K-theory is a motivic spectrum, and in fact it is represented by the $\mathbb{P}^1$-spectrum that is $BGL_\...
Denis Nardin's user avatar
  • 16.5k
13 votes

Voevodsky's Triangulated Categories of Motives and their Relationships

I won't embark on the difficult question of what one wants out of a category of motives, but I can make some comments on what might motivate the various choices of topologies. Nisnevich (aka ...
Shane Kelly's user avatar
12 votes
Accepted

Smallness of the category of schemes of finite type

You can prove essential smallness of the category of finite type $S$-schemes (without further assumptions), where $S$ is any scheme, as follows: If $S$ is affine and we only consider affine finite ...
HeinrichD's user avatar
  • 5,482
10 votes
Accepted

What are the advantages of various "models" for the motivic stable homotopy category

The injective model structure is monoidal (satisfies the pushout product axiom), see Hornbostel's paper "Localizations in motivic homotopy theory", Thm 1.9 and Lemma 1.10. The projective model ...
David White's user avatar
  • 30.3k
9 votes

Could a motivic spectrum have a "zeta function"?

Etale cohomology factors through the stable $\mathbb A^1$ homotopy type. So you should simply consider your local zeta factor in terms of traces of frobenius on etale cohomology. Since smashing with $...
user1092847's user avatar
  • 1,347
8 votes
Accepted

What is the best reference for motives?

I would add this as a comment, but I do not have enough reputation to do so. While there are certainly more contemporary references, Voevodsky's "Triangulated category of motives over a field" is a ...
Liam Keenan's user avatar
8 votes

Is there a geometric realization of $\mathbf{C}((t))$-varieties?

I don't know about $\mathbb A^1$-homotopy categories. Let me try to do something that I think will work just for the category of quasiprojective varieties. The key lemma is this: There is a ...
Will Sawin's user avatar
  • 148k
8 votes
Accepted

What is the etale sheafification of the (unramified) Milnor-Witt $K$-theory

We have a short exact sequence of sheaves of abelian groups (see e.g. Morel's book on $\mathbb{A}^1$-algebraic topology): $$ 0\to\mathbf{I}^{n+1}\to\mathbf{K}^{\rm MW}_n\to \mathbf{K}^{\rm M}_n\to 0, ...
Matthias Wendt's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Inverting objects in a symmetric monoidal category

To be clear, this claim refers to a very specific construction of $\mathcal{C}[X^{-1}]$, where you copy the construction of the localization of the ring and defines it as the colimits of: $$ \mathcal{...
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
7 votes

Smallness of the category of schemes of finite type

Asking about smallness instead of essential smallness is a distraction; smallness is not invariant under equivalence of categories, so the answer potentially depends delicately on how you construct ...
Qiaochu Yuan's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

When is the Thom spectrum of a virtual vector bundle effective?

Yes. A bit more generally, if $\xi$ is a perfect complex of rank $\geq 0$, then $Th(\xi)$ is effective (even very effective): the question is Nisnevich-local on $X$ and $\xi$ is locally a complex of ...
Marc Hoyois's user avatar
  • 8,972
7 votes

Are there non trivial maps from $H\mathbb{Z}$ to $MGL$?

NO such a map does not exist. Thanks to Eric Peterson for making me realize that the argument carries through even if the map is not a map of algebras. By rigidity,you can only consider the case ...
Denis Nardin's user avatar
  • 16.5k
7 votes
Accepted

Is the $\mathbb A^1$ homotopy type of a punctured curve independent of the choice of puncture?

If I understand it correctly, this follows from the results of Severitt's master's thesis. (I am not an expert on this, so it is possible I misread one of the statements.) Indeed, Lemma 9.1.1 shows ...
R. van Dobben de Bruyn's user avatar
6 votes

Motivic cohomology is universal with respect to what (co)homology theories?

I think a proof that motivic Borel-Moore homology is a universal Borel-Moore homology theory could be deduced from work of Bloch, Geisser-Levine, and Voevodsky, at least for varieties over fields. I ...
Jesse Silliman's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

Basic questions on spectra

Here is a slightly more fleshed out version of the comment above. First, the claim that the collection $\mathcal{C} = \{ \Sigma^{p,q} U \mid U \in Sm/S, p,q \in \mathbb{Z} \}$ is a collection of ...
Drew Heard's user avatar
  • 3,785
6 votes
Accepted

$\mathbf{A}^1$-invariance of Brauer groups and $H^2_{\mathrm{et}}(-;\mathbb{G}_m)$

(For $i=0$, the map $H_{\mathrm{et}}^{0}(\operatorname{Spec} A,\mathbb{G}_{m}) \to H_{\mathrm{et}}^{0}(\operatorname{Spec} A[t],\mathbb{G}_{m})$ is an isomorphism if and only if $A$ is reduced.) For $...
Minseon Shin's user avatar
  • 2,017
5 votes

What is the best reference for motives?

A wealth of information is contained in: Uwe Jannsen, Steven L. Kleiman, Jean Pierre Serre, “Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol 55, Parts 1 and 2”. Amer Mathematical Society (February 1, ...
jmc's user avatar
  • 5,494
5 votes
Accepted

Model category structure on spectra

Is there a model structure on Spt(S), having SH(S) as homotopy category, such that every object is fibrant? If so, could you provide a reference? No, if the given model category of spectra Spt(S) (...
Dmitri Pavlov's user avatar
5 votes

Model category structure on spectra

Since you tagged this as a reference request, let me give you some relevant references. The first injective model structure for motivic spectra that I am aware of is Jardine's paper Motivic Symmetric ...
David White's user avatar
  • 30.3k
5 votes

A question about the vanishing of motivic cohomology in negative Tate twist

Here's an easy way to see this (which is more or less an elaboration of Mikhail's answer): Suppose $i > 0$ and $n\in \mathbb Z$. We have the Thom isomorphism $$ H^n(X, \mathbb Z(-i)) \cong H^{n+2i}...
Marc Hoyois's user avatar
  • 8,972

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible