Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with fields
Search options not deleted
user 83384
Fields as algebraic objects. For vector and tensor fields, use eg. [dg.differential-geometry]. For physical fields, use eg. [mp.mathematical-physics] or [quantum-field-theory].
2
votes
0
answers
110
views
Infinitesimally small elements in extensions of models of model-complete theories
Let $T$ a be a topological $\mathcal{L}$-theory of fields in the sense of Pillay.. this means that not only is $T$ a theory fields but also there is an $\mathcal{L}$-formula $\phi(x,\bar y)$ such that … Suppose I have models $\mathcal{M},\mathcal{N}\models T$ expanding fields $K,L$ respectively such that $\mathcal{M}\subseteq \mathcal{N}$. …
