Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 805

Linear representations of algebras and groups, Lie theory, associative algebras, multilinear algebra.

7 votes

Intuition behind the definition of quantum groups

Here is a possible affirmative answer to question (2). (Which is to say, I am not aware of any non-quantum way to answer this question.) I assume from the original post that it is sufficient motivatio …
Sean Clark's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

Why are the divided difference operators of the nil Hecke ring only of degree 1?

It is not true that the crossing is necessarily in degree $1$. More precisely, if $\delta_{k,\mathbf i}$ is the crossing between strands $k$ and $k+1$ for the sequence $\mathbf i=(i_1,\ldots, i_m)$, t …
Sean Clark's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

"Quantum Littlewood-Richardson" Rule?

Yes, there certainly is a quantum version of the Littlewood-Richardson decomposition (in the generic parameter case) for types $A,B,C,D$ (I don't know about the exceptional types). The generalized Lit …
Sean Clark's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Motivations of cross product

It's the Hopf-algebraic version of the semidirect product of groups. To see this, just consider the case you have groups $G, H, G\rtimes H$. The group rings (over, say, a field $k$) are Hopf algebras …
Sean Clark's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Examples of canonical bases

The complete calculation is done in Lusztig's book (Lemma 42.1.2). Essentially, the condition $b\geq a+c$ comes from the Serre relations; e.g. we have $$E_1E_2E_1=E_1^{(2)}E_2+E_2E_1^{(2)}.$$
Sean Clark's user avatar
3 votes

Dimension of $\mathfrak{sl}_n$ modules

It is quite possible formulas exist or can be found. I don't know of any off the top of my head, but I know that it amounts to counting semistandard tableaux. I do not know of a formula for this numbe …
Sean Clark's user avatar