Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Linear representations of algebras and groups, Lie theory, associative algebras, multilinear algebra.
4
votes
Accepted
Examples of canonical bases
The complete calculation is done in Lusztig's book (Lemma 42.1.2). Essentially, the condition $b\geq a+c$ comes from the Serre relations; e.g. we have
$$E_1E_2E_1=E_1^{(2)}E_2+E_2E_1^{(2)}.$$
3
votes
Dimension of $\mathfrak{sl}_n$ modules
It is quite possible formulas exist or can be found. I don't know of any off the top of my head, but I know that it amounts to counting semistandard tableaux. I do not know of a formula for this numbe …
6
votes
Accepted
Why are the divided difference operators of the nil Hecke ring only of degree 1?
It is not true that the crossing is necessarily in degree $1$. More precisely, if $\delta_{k,\mathbf i}$ is the crossing between strands $k$ and $k+1$ for the sequence $\mathbf i=(i_1,\ldots, i_m)$, t …
4
votes
Accepted
Motivations of cross product
It's the Hopf-algebraic version of the semidirect product of groups. To see this, just consider the case you have groups $G, H, G\rtimes H$. The group rings (over, say, a field $k$) are Hopf algebras …
6
votes
Accepted
"Quantum Littlewood-Richardson" Rule?
Yes, there certainly is a quantum version of the Littlewood-Richardson decomposition (in the generic parameter case) for types $A,B,C,D$ (I don't know about the exceptional types). The generalized Lit …
7
votes
Intuition behind the definition of quantum groups
Here is a possible affirmative answer to question (2). (Which is to say, I am not aware of any non-quantum way to answer this question.) I assume from the original post that it is sufficient motivatio …