Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
12
votes
Accepted
Can hypercomplete objects be coreflective?
Let $\mathcal{X}$ be the $\infty$-category of $1$-excisive functors from (pointed) spaces to (unpointed) spaces: equivalently, the $\infty$-category of pairs $(X, E)$ where $X$ is a space and $E$ is a …
20
votes
Accepted
Examples of $(\infty,1)$-topoi that are not given as sheaves on a Grothendieck topology
Marc's examples are good ones, but let me add two more (which are closely related to each other):
1) Let $\mathcal{C}$ be an accessible $\infty$-category which admits small filtered colimits, and let …
10
votes
Boolean non-hypercomplete $(\infty,1)$-toposes
If $G$ is a profinite group, then the topos of sets with a continuous $G$-action is
Boolean, but the associated $\infty$-topos is usually not hypercomplete.
11
votes
Accepted
Associative Ring Spectra and Derived Completion
If by ``effective monomorphism'' you mean the categorical dual of the condition of being an effective epimorphism, then it is not (or at least not obviously) equivalent to the statement that A can be …
28
votes
Accepted
Relation between topos and $\infty$-topos
For any space $X$, there's an $\infty$-topos of spaces fibered over $X$. The underlying
ordinary topos is the category of representations of the fundamental groupoid of $X$.
So if $X$ is simply connec …
21
votes
Accepted
What would be an infinity-groupoid analogue of the duality between sets and complete atomic ...
Let $\mathcal{S}$ denote the $\infty$-category of spaces. For any $\infty$-topos $\mathcal{X}$, there is an essentially unique geometric morphism $\pi^{\ast}: \mathcal{S} \rightarrow \mathcal{X}$. The …
15
votes
Accepted
Is an ∞-topos of local homotopy dimension $\leq n$ of homotopy dimension $\leq n$?
Let $\mathcal{X}$ denote the $\infty$-topos $\mathcal{S}_{/S^1}$, whose objects are spaces $X$ with a map $X \rightarrow S^1$. Then $\mathcal{X}$ is generated under colimits by the object given by the …
32
votes
Reflection principle vs universes
I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that the book HTT never uses anything stronger than replacement for $\Sigma_{15}$-formulas of set theory. (Here $15$ is a randomly chosen large number, and HT …
10
votes
Accepted
classifying $\infty$-toposes for topological/localic groups?
The projection map $p: \mathbf{R} \rightarrow \ast$ induces a fully faithful embedding of sheaf categories $p^{\ast}: Shv(\ast) \rightarrow Shv( \mathbf{R} )$. This is equally true for sheaves of sets …
28
votes
Accepted
Reflection principle vs universes
Reflecting on Gabe's comment on my original answer, I now think what I wrote is misleading because it conflates two separate (but related) assertions:
The existence of strongly inaccessible cardinals …