Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with torus-action
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 66
2
votes
0
answers
361
views
Are schematic fixed points of a torus action on an affinized twistor deformation flat?
This is a follow-up to some earlier questions about flatness of schematic fixed points of certain deformations. Since I could never come up with good enough hypotheses in those examples, let me try a …
CommunityBot
- 1
4
votes
2
answers
607
views
Are schematic fixed-points of a Cohen-Macaulay scheme Cohen-Macaulay?
I'm not sure how long this iterative questions can go on, but let me try again. Let's say $X$ is a Cohen-Macaulay scheme with an action of $\mathbb{G}_m$ (i.e. if $X$ is affine, a grading on the coor …
CommunityBot
- 1
5
votes
1
answer
598
views
Under what hypotheses are schematic fixed points of a flat deformation themselves flat?
This is something of a follow-up question to this one; I hope people won't think this is a duplicate. At least in my head, it seems like a distinct enough question to merit a fresh start.
All my sch …
CommunityBot
- 1
8
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Understanding the unreducedness of a subscheme supported on fixed points
EDIT: Based on comments, I've decided to essentially rewrite this question. My apologies to those who commented below, whose comments seem a bit off topic when you try to match them with the current …
CommunityBot
- 1