Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
1
vote
Equivariant Coefficient ring action on singular cohomology
$EG$ is also the universal free $G$-space, meaning that, if $X$ is a free $G$-space (let's assume of the $G$-homotopy type of a $G$-CW complex), there is, up to $G$-homotopy, a unique $G$-map $X\to EG …
3
votes
Accepted
Bredon cohomology of a permutation action on $S^3$
Your final answer is correct, but the cell structure you're using isn't a $G$-CW structure: $T\times T$ can't be used as a cell in this way.
I would approach it like this: The action of $G = {\mathbb …
10
votes
Allowing $G$-CW complexes to have more general cells
Let me start with the fact that, in one sense, it's true that Type 1 complexes are all that are "needed." That's true in the sense that complexes built from Type 2 and 3 cells have the $G$-homotopy ty …
2
votes
Bredon cohomology of a sign representation for a cyclic group of order 4
To expand on Mark Grant's answer, but looking at it slightly differently: You need to look at the chains as contravariant functors on the orbit category, and they will be projective functors. $\underl …
5
votes
Accepted
Calculations of cup products in Bredon cohomology
Frankly, there aren't many calculations out there. Most of the work I know of is on the calculation of the $RO(G)$-graded cohomology of a point, of a projective space, or of $B_GO(n)$. Here are some r …