Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
10
votes
1
answer
336
views
A "small" definition of sub-(∞,1)-topoi
Suppose I have an $(\infty,1)$-topos $\mathcal{X}$ and a (small) set of maps $S$ in $\mathcal{X}$, which therefore generates an accessible localization $S^{-1}\mathcal{X}$. Is there any "small" condi …
2
votes
1
answer
244
views
Can hypercompletion be an essential localization?
The subcategory of hypercomplete objects in an ∞-topos is a left-exact-reflective subcategory by the remarks after 6.5.2.8 of Higher topos theory, i.e. its inclusion functor has a left-exact left adjo …
5
votes
1
answer
353
views
Are semisimplicial hypercoverings in a hypercomplete $\infty$-topos effective?
A hypercovering in an $\infty$-topos $E$ is a simplicial object $U \in {\rm Fun}(\Delta^{\rm op},E)$ such that each map $U_n \to ({\rm cosk}_{n-1} U)_n$ is an effective epimorphism. Theorem 6.5.3.12 …
10
votes
1
answer
584
views
Boolean non-hypercomplete $(\infty,1)$-toposes
Let's say that an $(\infty,1)$-topos is Boolean if for every object $X$, the lattice $Sub(X)$ of subobjects (i.e. $(-1)$-truncated morphisms into $X$) is a Boolean algebra. I think this is equivalent …
10
votes
1
answer
567
views
Lex $\infty$-colimits
In the paper lex colimits, Garner and Lack gave a general characterization of "exactness properties" for categories (and enriched categories). A "lex-weight" is a weight for colimits whose domain cat …
6
votes
1
answer
572
views
Can hypercomplete objects be coreflective?
The subcategory of hypercomplete objects in an ∞-topos is a left-exact-reflective subcategory by the remarks after 6.5.2.8 of Higher topos theory. Can it ever happen that this subcategory is also cor …
5
votes
1
answer
211
views
Fibrations of sites for $\infty$-topoi
For any geometric morphism $f:\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{E}$ of Grothendieck 1-topoi, there exists a functor of small categories $\ell :D\to C$ and left exact localizations $\mathcal{F} \hookrightarrow …
6
votes
0
answers
344
views
$(\infty,1)$-topoi generated by $(n,1)$-categories
A (1,1)-topos (i.e. an ordinary Grothendieck topos) is called localic if the following two equivalent conditions hold:
It is the category of sheaves on a (0,1)-site with finite limits$^*$ (i.e. a mee …
7
votes
0
answers
150
views
Presenting geometric morphisms by geometric morphisms
It's known that any $\infty$-topos $\mathcal{E}$ can be presented by a Quillen model category $\mathbf{E}$ that is itself a 1-topos. For instance, if $\mathcal{E}$ is a left exact localization of a p …
10
votes
0
answers
581
views
A model category for descent?
Recall that an $(\infty,1)$-category $C$ is said to have descent if for any small diagram $X:I\to M$ with (homotopy) colimit $\overline{X}$, the adjunction between $C/\overline{X}$ and "equifibered" $ …