Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 49
7 votes

What structure do natural isomorphisms preserve?

The simplest case is that for a fixed (small) category $C$, there is a (multi-sorted) first-order theory whose models are functors $C\to \rm Set$: it has one sort for every object of $C$, and one func …
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 66.7k
3 votes
Accepted

Action of a strict 2-group on a category gives autoequivalences?

I could be wrong (it's hard to be sure since the phrase "preserves inverses" is a bit vague), but I think that's why they said they were defining only a strict action. A weak action would only preser …
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 66.7k
2 votes

Functoriality of the adjoint functor construction?

Yes. The map $G_{A'} \to F_f \circ G_A$ is called the mate of $T_f : F_A \to F_{A'} \circ F_f$. It's the composite $$ G_{A'} \to G_{A'} F_A G_A \to G_{A'} F_{A'} F_f G_A \to F_f G_A$$ of $T_f$ wit …
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 66.7k
4 votes

How to distinguish between natural and unnatural equivalences of categories

On the other hand to Tom's answer, the distinction between strong and weak equivalences disappears if you use anafunctors instead of functors, which is arguably the "right" way to do category theory i …
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 66.7k