Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
This tag is for questions about Gödel's constructible universe $L$, and related constructions such as $L[X]$ and $L(X)$.
1
vote
What's the order type of the following set?
Edit 2024: I now think that this answer is wrong, specifically that the result in the last paragraph does not answer the original question. I am reluctant to delete this answer as it would also delete …
3
votes
Accepted
A question on the size of an admissible ordinal
Some references to literature: In "Reflection and Partition Properties of Admissible Ordinals" (Annals of Math. Logic vol. 22, iss. 3, 1982), Kranakis defines a $\Sigma_n$-admissible ordinal to be an …
1
vote
Why can't $L_\beta$ contain a real coding a well-ordering of order-type $\beta$, when $\beta...
A proof now appears as lemma 1.21 of the poster's bachelor's thesis "The real numbers in inner models of set theory" (2022, arXiv), however I have a doubt about the proof which is expressed in a comme …
3
votes
Parameter-free effective cardinals
Edit Jul 25: These results may be strengthenable by using theorem 7.8 of chapter V of Admissible Sets and Structures instead of lemma 1, I may edit this post in the future with any resulting improveme …
3
votes
End-extension in Gödel's constructible universe
This is in the same vein as Monroe Eskew's comments. For $n\geq 1$, given that $\alpha<\beta$ and $L_\alpha\prec_{\Sigma_n}L_\beta$, it is not always possible to produce even a $\Sigma_1$ end-extensio …
1
vote
Accepted
End elementary extension in infinitary logic of some $L_\alpha$ producing a $L_\beta$
(Turning some comments into an answer)
The definition of $L(x,\alpha+1)$ was wrong, instead it should have been $$L(x,\alpha+1)\leftrightarrow\bigvee_{n\in\omega}\bigvee_{\varphi}\exists p_1,\ldots,p_ …
4
votes
0
answers
151
views
Slicing large countable ordinal properties, from $\Pi_3$-reflection to $\Sigma_2$-admissibility
Edit 2024: This post was based on an incorrect premise, as can be seen by my conversation with Farmer S in the comments. However the mistake I made and the conversation in comments may be instructive …
3
votes
1
answer
288
views
When does $\Pi_2$-reflection on $X$ fail to imply iterated $\Pi_1$-reflection on $X$?
Let lowercase Greek letters denote ordinals. Recall from Richter and Aczel's "Inductive definitions and reflecting properties of admissible ordinals", for a set of formulae $\Gamma$ and a class of ord …
5
votes
Do all limit $\alpha \in \omega_1^L$ satisfy $L_\alpha \models V=HC$?
As Asaf mentioned, this is not true. It's indeed true that when $\alpha$ is a gap ordinal $L_\alpha\vDash\textrm{V=HC}$, but when considering some ordinals above gap ordinals we get points where it fa …