Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
For questions about sheaves on a topological space.
17
votes
Accepted
Is $H^i(X,F)$ finitely generated over $\Gamma(O_X)$ if $F$ is coherent?
This is false even for $\mathrm H^0$: take $X$ to be $\mathbb A^2 \smallsetminus \{0\}$, and as $F$ the structure sheaf of $L \smallsetminus \{0\}$, where $L$ is a line through $0$.
11
votes
The single-plus construction is not the left adjoint of the inclusion of separated presheaves?
About your first question: the relation is transitive. If $a$ is equivalent to $b$ using a covering, and $b$ is equivalent to $c$ using another covering, it is easy to see that $a$ is equivalent to $c …
9
votes
What are the merits of the different finiteness conditions on quasi-coherent sheaves?
Of course, the correct definition of coherence is that in your Question 2. It just so happens that for a sheaf of modules on a scheme it is equivalent to the easier one.
As far as a I know, the notio …
7
votes
Accepted
Question about hypercohomology / spectral sequence of a complex of "almost-acyclic" sheaves
Ok, so what will the spectral sequence give you? This is a very easy exercise, but since Altgr is not experienced, here is the solution. The term $E_2^{p,q}$ is the $p^{\rm th}$ cohomology group of th …
4
votes
Accepted
Constants sheaves on an open subset
This is not true; for example, take $X = \mathbb R^2$, $U = \mathbb R^2 \smallsetminus \{(0,0)\}$. Then your $\mathbb Z_U$ coincides with $\mathbb Z_X$, and $Hom(\mathbb Z_U, F)$ is $F(X)$, not $F(U)$ …
2
votes
Accepted
Carving out subsheaves of local hom-sheaves of stacks of categories
Taking equalizers, or limits, is also the standard algebraic geometry way. So, for example, say that $X \to S$ and $Y \to S$ are finitely presented and proper, with $X\to S$ flat, and have sections $S …