Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with transcendental-number-theory
Search options not deleted
user 450
13
votes
1
answer
4k
views
Is there another controversial statement by Grothendieck apart from 57 being prime?
There is a well-known story about Grothendieck being asked to explain concretely some result involving prime numbers and of his answering "You mean an actual number? All right, take 57".
See here.
Un …
- 47.5k
33
votes
Is there another controversial statement by Grothendieck apart from 57 being prime?
Yes, he did.
In his Récoltes et semailles, volume I posthumously edited by Gallimard in 2022 he reminisces (in footnote 68, page 522) about his first encounter with $\pi$ as a child:
"La valeur appro …
- 47.5k